Viewing a response to: @egotheist/re-simoxenham-why-science-blogging-needs-saving-20180425t145004464z
Yes, there's certainly two sides to the coin. I found this became less of a problem however once upvoting and downvoting of comments became possible.
| post_id | 45,358,727 |
|---|---|
| author | simoxenham |
| permlink | re-egotheist-re-simoxenham-why-science-blogging-needs-saving-20180425t145215011z |
| category | steemstem |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemstem"]}" |
| created | 2018-04-25 14:52:18 |
| last_update | 2018-04-25 14:52:18 |
| depth | 2 |
| children | 1 |
| net_rshares | 93,182,824,307 |
| last_payout | 2018-05-02 14:52:18 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.464 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.130 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 149 |
| author_reputation | 10,797,751,623,277 |
| root_title | "Why Science Blogging Needs Saving" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dhimmel | 0 | 84,271,584,559 | 100% | ||
| egotheist | 0 | 8,911,239,748 | 100% |
Yeah, downvoting this stuff is definitely a helpful improvement. That's why I like the flagging option on Steemit. You cannot delete comments (which is a good thing), but you can rip their creators of their rewards and reputation. That's at least a start.
| post_id | 45,362,340 |
|---|---|
| author | egotheist |
| permlink | re-simoxenham-re-egotheist-re-simoxenham-why-science-blogging-needs-saving-20180425t151712498z |
| category | steemstem |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemstem"]}" |
| created | 2018-04-25 15:17:12 |
| last_update | 2018-04-25 15:17:12 |
| depth | 3 |
| children | 0 |
| net_rshares | 97,730,557,835 |
| last_payout | 2018-05-02 15:17:12 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.560 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.063 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 255 |
| author_reputation | 31,380,991,891,751 |
| root_title | "Why Science Blogging Needs Saving" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dhimmel | 0 | 82,356,321,273 | 100% | ||
| simoxenham | 0 | 15,374,236,562 | 22% |