RE: Why Science Blogging Needs Saving by transparencybot

steemstem · @transparencybot · Apr 25 '18 (edited)

<h3>This post, with over $50.00 in bidbot payouts, has received votes from the following:</h3>

upme payout in the amount of $182 STU, $335 USD.
appreciator payout in the amount of $80 STU, $147 USD.
boomerang payout in the amount of $20 STU, $37 USD.
upmyvote payout in the amount of $12 STU, $22 USD.

**For a total calculated bidbot upvote value of $295 STU, $541 USD before curation, with approx. $74 USD curation being earned by the bidbots.**

This information is being presented in the interest of transparency on our platform @simoxenham **and is by no means a judgement of your work.**

properties (22)

`post_id`	45,364,577
`author`	transparencybot
`permlink`	re-why-science-blogging-needs-saving--bidbot
`category`	steemstem
`json_metadata`	"{"format": "markdown", "app": "null/null", "users": ["simoxenham"], "tags": ["bidbot", "transparencybot"]}"
`created`	2018-04-25 15:32:45
`last_update`	2018-04-25 17:09:21
`depth`	1
`children`	0
`net_rshares`	0
`last_payout`	2018-05-02 15:32:45
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	603
`author_reputation`	-5,637,818,769,034
`root_title`	"Why Science Blogging Needs Saving"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000