Viewing a response to: @simoxenham/why-science-blogging-needs-saving
Damn, you've really been knocking it out of the park with your first few posts, you make me want to go back to the deep dive, big research content I was doing when I started on steemit.
| post_id | 45,362,796 |
|---|---|
| author | trismegistuz |
| permlink | re-simoxenham-why-science-blogging-needs-saving-20180425t152023423z |
| category | steemstem |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemstem"]}" |
| created | 2018-04-25 15:20:27 |
| last_update | 2018-04-25 15:20:27 |
| depth | 1 |
| children | 2 |
| net_rshares | 68,543,471,341 |
| last_payout | 2018-05-02 15:20:27 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.430 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.007 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 185 |
| author_reputation | 1,959,847,242,549 |
| root_title | "Why Science Blogging Needs Saving" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| simoxenham | 0 | 68,543,471,341 | 100% |
Thanks! Followed - Keep it up :) The research community tends to change their practices very slowly, but you've got a big advantage being here so early - I wish I was here in the early days!
| post_id | 45,363,626 |
|---|---|
| author | simoxenham |
| permlink | re-trismegistuz-re-simoxenham-why-science-blogging-needs-saving-20180425t152613220z |
| category | steemstem |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemstem"]}" |
| created | 2018-04-25 15:26:15 |
| last_update | 2018-04-25 15:26:15 |
| depth | 2 |
| children | 1 |
| net_rshares | 9,426,869,303 |
| last_payout | 2018-05-02 15:26:15 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.046 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.011 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 190 |
| author_reputation | 10,797,751,623,277 |
| root_title | "Why Science Blogging Needs Saving" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| trismegistuz | 0 | 9,426,869,303 | 100% |
Oh thanks! Appreciate it, wasn't even fishing for a follow ;) Ahh, I wish I had more to show for the advantage though. As you might've noticed I picked up on the site almost 2 years ago and don't have much to show for it. I'm still in a bio undergrad so I don't have too much time to put together work and little extra funds as you could imagine a student does. Most of my time pays off it terms of experience in writing and understanding the platform, as it really can be a *pay in* site. Having good content is a requirement, but the means to put some serious steem power in your wallet is what really counts as you may have seen. The more you can fund, the more visibility and steem you can rack in those early days which is what matters.
| post_id | 45,637,516 |
|---|---|
| author | trismegistuz |
| permlink | re-simoxenham-re-trismegistuz-re-simoxenham-why-science-blogging-needs-saving-20180427t062250857z |
| category | steemstem |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemstem"]}" |
| created | 2018-04-27 06:22:54 |
| last_update | 2018-04-27 06:23:48 |
| depth | 3 |
| children | 0 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
| last_payout | 2018-05-04 06:22:54 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 745 |
| author_reputation | 1,959,847,242,549 |
| root_title | "Why Science Blogging Needs Saving" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bartelby | 0 | 0 | 100% |