Wow... Some of the stuff I read on Steemit never ceases to amaze me. So you reckon  my "reviews" don't go in-depth enough for you, right? Well, maybe I'll start a new series tag-lined "In-depth analysis" instead and go into pages and pages of what you "really" wanna hear. But sadly time constraints in my private life prevent me from doing so.

Jeez, I tell ya. 

> "X character was good. Y character was bad. Conversations good. Visuals were good. Better than last time. Movie was okay. Similar to Z movie."

What's that supposed to mean? You've just described a few key elements of any movie, lol. Every post I've written links back to the movie in question with examples as to "why" I reached the conclusions I did. I mean, doesn't every "review" out there have a format too? Whilst I may touch on similar aspects of movies throughout, they are "my" personal take on "that" particular movie. Based on those factors related to movies! Namely *characters, cinematography, acting skills, etc*.  Not just some randomly generic ramblings.

But anyways, that's beside the point. I noticed you joined pretty recently. So maybe instead of spending your time "criticising" others posts on what you think they ought to be, try to concentrate on building your "own" blog and following. Coz I like to think I've earned my place here on Steemit. You see, that's the beauty of this platform. You think you can do a better job? Go right ahead and start reviewing stuff. At the moment, all the credit to your name is a bunch of resteems. Would love to see you're professionalism in action.

Other than that, I think we're done here. Best of luck and hope you fix the errors you saw in my posts via your own blog... *(Unbelievable)*...