RE: Blockchain 101 - Why double producing is bad by felander

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @crt/re-timcliff-blockchain-101-why-double-producing-is-bad-20180510t214238650z

· @felander ·
$0.06
I would agree in a sense, being a witness is not for everyone  but it should not only be for the "tech savvy either" we just recently set up our witness as a project because we are 2 steemians and someone technologically inclined and we are a fan of steem... do we really know the ins and outs? no we do not but we are learning... We had our first block yesterday, and missed it but I do not know if it was due to this double producing.  So now we have shut off the server and rebuilt the whole build from scratch instead of following a manual.  
So I agree for you there... the votes should come from community work, and running a good service and not from tit for tat...
We are learning on the way.  But that would also be why we start lower and then have a chance to build up votes
our witness is @swisswitness
👍  
properties (23)
post_id48,022,720
authorfelander
permlinkre-crt-re-timcliff-blockchain-101-why-double-producing-is-bad-20180511t080615811z
categorywitness-category
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["swisswitness"], "tags": ["witness-category"]}"
created2018-05-11 08:06:15
last_update2018-05-11 08:06:15
depth2
children1
net_rshares14,255,619,780
last_payout2018-05-18 08:06:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.047 SBD
curator_payout_value0.014 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length813
author_reputation160,529,759,686,946
root_title"Blockchain 101 - Why double producing is bad"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@crt · (edited)
$0.80
Well, that's something totally different and totally ok, if someone is learning with a goal to achieve full understanding of the platform and provide great service. 

Few months ago, I offered "paid witness setup", but these who contacted me willing to pay for such work, got it totally fee (along with support). I am glad some of them are successful, still doing their work. The 'payment' was just a trick to distinguish who is serious and who is not.  They got a full training and explanation to any questions they had.

I have nothing against a total newbie who is willing to learn, and I will always support that by all means and sure others will too. But the real problem is that some people are pushing way more into campaigns / trading votes / begging for votes, rather then understanding technology. At the end of the day, they do rank better, and platform suffers.

I don't think anyone needs to have PhD in computer science to be a witness, the only requirements is to take it seriously, act ethically, learn new things, and support others.

Lucky enough most of witnesses we have are great people. But if you want to distinguish others, just check how many of them become inactive whenever SBD goes down on the market, and then get back once it raises.
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id48,029,898
authorcrt
permlinkre-felander-re-crt-re-timcliff-blockchain-101-why-double-producing-is-bad-20180511t090817475z
categorywitness-category
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["witness-category"]}"
created2018-05-11 09:08:18
last_update2018-05-11 09:15:45
depth3
children0
net_rshares174,065,272,705
last_payout2018-05-18 09:08:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.600 SBD
curator_payout_value0.196 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,263
author_reputation2,296,736,176,338
root_title"Blockchain 101 - Why double producing is bad"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)