RE: Inactive and outdated Witnesses by slobberchops

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @quochuy/3spuei-inactive-and-outdated-witnesses

· @slobberchops ·
Thanks for the reminder, I had one dead witness and I see you're up to around #50 now. I now have 4 empty witness slots and there's a reason why.

<center>***...'they need to bring something to the table for me to give them a vote'...***</center>

They say you should use all your witness votes, but I'm not for giving them away easily. I can see you have listed the things you have done but is that enough?

Commenting back to people is something. I can see you do this unlike some of them who are so far up their own arses they can't be bothered.

Maybe I can move you up a slot, maybe not. I'm not asking for something in return as that would hardly be ethical but why should I give you my vote?
πŸ‘  
πŸ‘Ž  , ,
properties (23)
post_id84,513,060
authorslobberchops
permlinkre-quochuy-q5wqs5
categorywitness-category
json_metadata{"tags":["witness-category"],"app":"steempeak\/2.2.8"}
created2020-02-18 17:19:15
last_update2020-02-18 17:19:15
depth1
children4
net_rshares104,040,084,101
last_payout2020-02-25 17:19:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length698
author_reputation328,599,324,760,066
root_title"Inactive and outdated Witnesses"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@quochuy ·
$0.03
You can always use all your votes and then change them later on as you discover more about the witnesses. 

However, It’s a good thing that you do research and ask about why you should vote for a witness before casting a vote.

As for me, it’s up to you to decide, obviously, but I’m also a developer and I have been contributing to the community by fixing bugs, redesigning and adding features to the Condenser (the app that powers Steemit.com). You can see my previous blog posts.

Posted using [Partiko iOS](https://partiko.app/referral/quochuy)
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
post_id84,515,705
authorquochuy
permlinkquochuy-re-slobberchops-re-quochuy-q5wqs5-20200218t193410042z
categorywitness-category
json_metadata{"app":"partiko","client":"ios"}
created2020-02-18 19:34:09
last_update2020-02-18 19:34:09
depth2
children0
net_rshares200,778,097,497
last_payout2020-02-25 19:34:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.017 SBD
curator_payout_value0.017 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length548
author_reputation192,999,220,769,295
root_title"Inactive and outdated Witnesses"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@smooth ·
$0.08
Yes, you should absolutely use all or at least most of your witness votes (4 empty slots is not a big deal) for the simple reason that it makes the chain more secure. By default, vote for any witness you believe to be non-malicious.

The smaller the number of total votes in use, the easier it is for an attacker (for example, someone who hacks an exchange and steals their STEEM) to vote in their own witnesses and cause havoc.

Of course, using all your votes does not preclude changing your votes in favor of a witness who, as you say, brings something to the table.

The safety and security of the chain (which means **your own investment**) benefits from as many people as possible using all or at least most your witness votes. In that sense, any responsible witness brings something to the table.
πŸ‘  , ,
πŸ‘Ž  , , ,
properties (23)
post_id84,521,940
authorsmooth
permlinkq5xday
categorywitness-category
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2020-02-19 01:25:48
last_update2020-02-19 01:25:48
depth2
children2
net_rshares434,098,208,383
last_payout2020-02-26 01:25:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.039 SBD
curator_payout_value0.038 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length803
author_reputation119,002,354,889,508
root_title"Inactive and outdated Witnesses"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (7)
@slobberchops ·
$0.07
>Of course, using all your votes does not preclude changing your votes in favor of a witness who, as you say, brings something to the table.

The last point you make is most poignant to me, some of the top witnesses.., I know of them but what do they do besides stick around in the top twenty?

I have been to TWO Steemfests now and met several. Some of my choices are down to who they are and whether they were '*unapproachable gods*' at SF3 and 4.

I see you are in the twenty. Other than knowing you have been here since day 1, command a lot of respect, I don't know what you contribute other than a lot of flags when HF21 started (which I'm grateful for as I am an abuse fighter).

You have no recent posts, and your bio says nothing.

![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmf57JaoBpqVdz19LWVYg7RBwn56MLDy9CuRQhmNcounJs/image.png)

This is not a dig at you, but unless I have been active since March 2016 (I regret missing the early years), then I have no reason to give my vote to @smooth.witness.

Others such as @gtg I have met, I spoke to at length and have dined with (at SF4), @blocktrades I had a decent conversation with on the final day at SF4. Are these reasons to give my vote?

Some of it is forging relationships and others I can see are doing great things, such as @steempeak, @curie, @roelandp and @good-karma.

It's not just you but quite a few in the top 30. We can't see what you are doing. Do you see my dilemma?
πŸ‘  
πŸ‘Ž  , , ,
properties (23)
post_id84,530,418
authorslobberchops
permlinkq5xw68
categorywitness-category
json_metadata{"users":["smooth.witness","gtg","blocktrades","steempeak","curie","roelandp","good-karma"],"image":["https:\/\/cdn.steemitimages.com\/DQmf57JaoBpqVdz19LWVYg7RBwn56MLDy9CuRQhmNcounJs\/image.png"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2020-02-19 08:13:21
last_update2020-02-19 08:13:21
depth3
children1
net_rshares369,994,440,596
last_payout2020-02-26 08:13:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.033 SBD
curator_payout_value0.033 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,433
author_reputation328,599,324,760,066
root_title"Inactive and outdated Witnesses"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@smooth ·
$0.40
I do not disagree with your voting philosophy. 

My only point was that it is better to vote for some witnesses who at least are trustworthy and competent to secure the chain even if the votes are still up for grabs by witnesses who do something more, than it is to leave the votes idle until you find such witnesses.

BTW, my witness account is pretty much only used for the witness itself, and I use this account for the social app. While I don't post all that often, I do engage regularly in comment threads (and as you noted, votes and especially downvotes).
πŸ‘  ,
πŸ‘Ž  , , ,
properties (23)
post_id84,564,167
authorsmooth
permlinkq5zwqb
categorywitness-category
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.2"}
created2020-02-20 10:20:42
last_update2020-02-20 10:20:42
depth4
children0
net_rshares2,100,966,464,013
last_payout2020-02-27 10:20:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.202 SBD
curator_payout_value0.202 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length562
author_reputation119,002,354,889,508
root_title"Inactive and outdated Witnesses"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (6)