RE: Blockchain 101 - Why double producing is bad by timcliff

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @mejustandrew/re-timcliff-blockchain-101-why-double-producing-is-bad-20180510t214657318z

· @timcliff ·
$0.12
Replied to your question in a different thread, but that is not something I am familiar with.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id47,957,159
authortimcliff
permlinkre-mejustandrew-re-timcliff-blockchain-101-why-double-producing-is-bad-20180510t215139330z
categorywitness-category
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["witness-category"]}"
created2018-05-10 21:51:39
last_update2018-05-10 21:51:39
depth2
children7
net_rshares25,187,908,333
last_payout2018-05-17 21:51:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.116 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length93
author_reputation262,354,724,187,317
root_title"Blockchain 101 - Why double producing is bad"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@mejustandrew ·
Oh, thank you so much, sorry for asking twice, I didn't thought you will be checking that comment with all the activity here :D
properties (22)
post_id47,957,307
authormejustandrew
permlinkre-timcliff-re-mejustandrew-re-timcliff-blockchain-101-why-double-producing-is-bad-20180510t215304146z
categorywitness-category
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["witness-category"]}"
created2018-05-10 21:53:03
last_update2018-05-10 21:53:03
depth3
children6
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-05-17 21:53:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length127
author_reputation5,580,417,174,769
root_title"Blockchain 101 - Why double producing is bad"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@timcliff ·
No worries :)
properties (22)
post_id47,957,443
authortimcliff
permlinkre-mejustandrew-re-timcliff-re-mejustandrew-re-timcliff-blockchain-101-why-double-producing-is-bad-20180510t215439488z
categorywitness-category
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["witness-category"]}"
created2018-05-10 21:54:39
last_update2018-05-10 21:54:39
depth4
children5
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-05-17 21:54:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length13
author_reputation262,354,724,187,317
root_title"Blockchain 101 - Why double producing is bad"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@mejustandrew ·
$0.04
Anyway, I have updated the PR after your comment, if there is anything you see wrong about it, I appreciate your input! 

And since in your PR about [guidelines](https://github.com/steemit/steem/blob/master/doc/git-guildelines.md) you introduce the branch **stable**, I wonder if the new PR should be opened against **develop** or **master**.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id47,957,825
authormejustandrew
permlinkre-timcliff-re-mejustandrew-re-timcliff-re-mejustandrew-re-timcliff-blockchain-101-why-double-producing-is-bad-20180510t215858034z
categorywitness-category
json_metadata"{"links": ["https://github.com/steemit/steem/blob/master/doc/git-guildelines.md"], "app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["witness-category"]}"
created2018-05-10 21:58:57
last_update2018-05-10 21:58:57
depth5
children4
net_rshares8,547,131,011
last_payout2018-05-17 21:58:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.037 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length342
author_reputation5,580,417,174,769
root_title"Blockchain 101 - Why double producing is bad"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)