RE: Teach the controversy: Softfork 0.22.2 // Stop and Correct // Potential futures by d-pend

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @holoz0r/re-aggroed-q6dv4f

· @d-pend ·
>There's a lot of prosperity and value in the platform itself, but content creators continue to get tiny rewards in contrast to the posts that are about the chain itself, written by witnesses. I know that its important to surface major updates and existential discussion to the top of the chain, but we need more content on steem that isn't about steem, and we need that content to be more heavilly rewarded.

This.
👍  , , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id84,783,902
authord-pend
permlinkq6e0ct
categorywitness
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.2"}
created2020-02-28 01:05:18
last_update2020-02-28 01:05:18
depth2
children0
net_rshares71,123,572,394
last_payout2020-03-06 01:05:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length415
author_reputation248,631,159,633,170
root_title"Teach the controversy: Softfork 0.22.2 // Stop and Correct // Potential futures"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (6)