RE: A genuine request by schattenjaeger

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @michelle.gent/a-genuine-request

· @schattenjaeger · (edited)
$0.23
No one ever said you were breaking any rules. That's your imagination talking. And considering you write novels, you probably have quite the imagination!

You were flagged because it was felt by that particular user that your posts were over rewarded when judging by your dollars per view ratio.

There are no rules in Steemit, Steemit is an anarchist wild west that simply functions on a stake based voting basis.

A stakeholder holds a certain amount of SP, and he or she then controls a portion of the reward pool.

That stakeholder can then use his or her stake to influence post payouts. No one ever needs to explain or justify a vote.  No one ever needs to justify an upvote, and a downvote is simply the opposite of an upvote.

It was simply this one person's opinion that your posts were over rewarded, and that those rewards should go elsewhere on the platform. You're making a much more complicated issue out of something that is not complicated at all.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
post_id18,508,875
authorschattenjaeger
permlinkre-michellegent-a-genuine-request-20171123t144109829z
categorywriting
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["writing"]}"
created2017-11-23 14:41:09
last_update2017-11-23 16:54:03
depth1
children0
net_rshares90,821,012,404
last_payout2017-11-30 14:41:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.170 SBD
curator_payout_value0.055 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length963
author_reputation133,181,666,357,162
root_title"A genuine request"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)