RE: Are Upvote Bots Necessarily the Enemy of Quality Content? by denmarkguy

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @giantbear/re-denmarkguy-are-upvote-bots-necessarily-the-enemy-of-quality-content-20171204t104111704z

· @denmarkguy ·
I applaud you for doing that... my voting and curation remains 100% manual, which sadly means there are sometimes some great content creators I don't get around to, all the time. But I just believe that a *social* content site is about people, not about automation. Now, if everyone used an upvote bot with as much discernment as you, maybe we wouldn't have issues... I'd like to think so. 

The other thing I try to make a point of doing is to *curate my own content.* Since I create a lot of posts around the idea of "engagement and interaction" it would make no sense for me to not come back and respond to interaction. Whether that "earns rewards," or not. Engagement is a two-way street...
properties (22)
post_id19,462,857
authordenmarkguy
permlinkre-giantbear-re-denmarkguy-are-upvote-bots-necessarily-the-enemy-of-quality-content-20171204t171901683z
categoryzappl
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["zappl"]}"
created2017-12-04 17:19:03
last_update2017-12-04 17:19:03
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-12-11 17:19:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length694
author_reputation491,033,487,460,031
root_title"Are Upvote Bots Necessarily the Enemy of Quality Content?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000