Viewing a response to: @zappl/re-denmarkguy-are-upvote-bots-necessarily-the-enemy-of-quality-content-20171204t092326z
@zappl, appreciate the comment... coming on a post launched from *your* platform! I would submit that this short form post DID create value-- as it generated interaction and had 50+ comments. So that's on the plus side. But we also have to look at the "signal-to-noise" ratio. Does someone who posts an endless stream of every bite of the taco they are eating "add value?" Or is that just noise/static? Things don't have value simply because "they exist." Zappl is somewhat modeled on twitter. I *use* twitter. But twitter is also home to millions of people who claim to have "100,000 followers" none of whom ever read or interact with a single one of that user's 500 daily tweets. Does that ocean of 256-character word soup have "value?" Translated to Steemit, would that just amount to so much "dust" on the blockchain? NOT a criticism, by the way... just a question in the discussion!
post_id | 19,464,861 |
---|---|
author | denmarkguy |
permlink | re-zappl-re-denmarkguy-are-upvote-bots-necessarily-the-enemy-of-quality-content-20171204t092326z-20171204t174948504z |
category | zappl |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["zappl"], "tags": ["zappl"]}" |
created | 2017-12-04 17:49:51 |
last_update | 2017-12-04 17:49:51 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-12-11 17:49:51 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 894 |
author_reputation | 487,279,092,618,993 |
root_title | "Are Upvote Bots Necessarily the Enemy of Quality Content?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |