RE: Are Upvote Bots Necessarily the Enemy of Quality Content? by denmarkguy

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @zappl/re-denmarkguy-are-upvote-bots-necessarily-the-enemy-of-quality-content-20171204t092326z

· @denmarkguy ·
@zappl, appreciate the comment... coming on a post launched from *your* platform!

I would submit that this short form post DID create value-- as it generated interaction and had 50+ comments. So that's on the plus side. 

But we also have to look at the "signal-to-noise" ratio. Does someone who posts an endless stream of every bite of the taco they are eating "add value?" Or is that just noise/static?

Things don't have value simply because "they exist." 

Zappl is somewhat modeled on twitter. I *use* twitter. But twitter is also home to millions of people who claim to have "100,000 followers" none of whom ever read or interact with a single one of that user's 500 daily tweets. Does that ocean of 256-character word soup have "value?" Translated to Steemit, would that just amount to so much "dust" on the blockchain?

NOT a criticism, by the way... just a question in the discussion!
properties (22)
post_id19,464,861
authordenmarkguy
permlinkre-zappl-re-denmarkguy-are-upvote-bots-necessarily-the-enemy-of-quality-content-20171204t092326z-20171204t174948504z
categoryzappl
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["zappl"], "tags": ["zappl"]}"
created2017-12-04 17:49:51
last_update2017-12-04 17:49:51
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-12-11 17:49:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length894
author_reputation487,279,092,618,993
root_title"Are Upvote Bots Necessarily the Enemy of Quality Content?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000