RE: Are Upvote Bots Necessarily the Enemy of Quality Content? by liliana.duarte

Viewing a response to: @mammasitta/re-denmarkguy-are-upvote-bots-necessarily-the-enemy-of-quality-content-20171204t100916272z

zappl · @liliana.duarte · Dec 4 '17

$0.13

I agree!! Wish those bots go away, or at least be used only by a third party, like @curie or "steemstem projects.

👍 mammasitta, denmarkguy, jsantana

`post_id`	19,435,801
`author`	liliana.duarte
`permlink`	re-mammasitta-re-denmarkguy-are-upvote-bots-necessarily-the-enemy-of-quality-content-20171204t104756270z
`category`	zappl
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["curie"], "tags": ["zappl"]}"
`created`	2017-12-04 10:48:03
`last_update`	2017-12-04 10:48:03
`depth`	2
`children`	6
`net_rshares`	34,906,419,798
`last_payout`	2017-12-11 10:48:03
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.116 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.011 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	113
`author_reputation`	70,794,578,438,414
`root_title`	"Are Upvote Bots Necessarily the Enemy of Quality Content?"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (3)

voter	rshares	pct
mammasitta	14,882,680,139	3%
jsantana	8,806,523,395	36%
denmarkguy	11,217,216,264	10%

@mammasitta · Dec 4 '17

$0.07

It would be more fair I think.....

👍 liliana.duarte

`post_id`	19,435,972
`author`	mammasitta
`permlink`	re-lilianaduarte-re-mammasitta-re-denmarkguy-are-upvote-bots-necessarily-the-enemy-of-quality-content-20171204t105126817z
`category`	zappl
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["zappl"]}"
`created`	2017-12-04 10:51:27
`last_update`	2017-12-04 10:51:27
`depth`	3
`children`	2
`net_rshares`	20,288,793,835
`last_payout`	2017-12-11 10:51:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.070 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.003 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	34
`author_reputation`	119,919,245,915,690
`root_title`	"Are Upvote Bots Necessarily the Enemy of Quality Content?"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
liliana.duarte	0 B		20,288,793,835	10%

@liliana.duarte · Dec 4 '17

$0.02

Yes. For me, this only applies to those bought upvoting bots. Sometimes I want to create my automatic voting bot to support those constant good content creators because I don't have time to see what everyone is posting everyday...and there's also the voting power question, I don't want to lose much of it. This has been my struggle this past months...

👍 mammasitta

`post_id`	19,436,407
`author`	liliana.duarte
`permlink`	re-mammasitta-re-lilianaduarte-re-mammasitta-re-denmarkguy-are-upvote-bots-necessarily-the-enemy-of-quality-content-20171204t105907757z
`category`	zappl
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["zappl"]}"
`created`	2017-12-04 10:59:15
`last_update`	2017-12-04 10:59:15
`depth`	4
`children`	1
`net_rshares`	5,953,072,055
`last_payout`	2017-12-11 10:59:15
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.021 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	357
`author_reputation`	70,794,578,438,414
`root_title`	"Are Upvote Bots Necessarily the Enemy of Quality Content?"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
mammasitta	0 B		5,953,072,055	1%

@mammasitta · Dec 4 '17

$0.03

All of OUR struggle indeed!

👍 liliana.duarte

`post_id`	19,436,563
`author`	mammasitta
`permlink`	re-lilianaduarte-re-mammasitta-re-lilianaduarte-re-mammasitta-re-denmarkguy-are-upvote-bots-necessarily-the-enemy-of-quality-content-20171204t110139610z
`category`	zappl
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["zappl"]}"
`created`	2017-12-04 11:01:39
`last_update`	2017-12-04 11:01:39
`depth`	5
`children`	0
`net_rshares`	8,542,650,036
`last_payout`	2017-12-11 11:01:39
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.030 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	27
`author_reputation`	119,919,245,915,690
`root_title`	"Are Upvote Bots Necessarily the Enemy of Quality Content?"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
liliana.duarte	0 B		8,542,650,036	4%

@denmarkguy · Dec 4 '17

$1.55

For me, that would be cool in the sense that it is in keeping with the ideal of Steemit as a "gift economy," if someone ELSE gifts me a bot vote. That's cool. Maybe they don't have enough SP to leave the sort of "tip" they'd like to, so they summon a bot (let's say) to give a brilliant piece of content a $1.00 upvote. I'm good with that.

So sure, that's "open to abuse" because people could create multiple accounts and "cross vote," using bots. But at least it might be SOME deterrent.

👍 mammasitta, liliana.duarte

`post_id`	19,461,472
`author`	denmarkguy
`permlink`	re-lilianaduarte-re-mammasitta-re-denmarkguy-are-upvote-bots-necessarily-the-enemy-of-quality-content-20171204t165947594z
`category`	zappl
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["zappl"]}"
`created`	2017-12-04 16:59:48
`last_update`	2017-12-04 16:59:48
`depth`	3
`children`	2
`net_rshares`	420,247,926,799
`last_payout`	2017-12-11 16:59:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	1.166 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.386 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	489
`author_reputation`	487,279,092,618,993
`root_title`	"Are Upvote Bots Necessarily the Enemy of Quality Content?"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
mammasitta	0 B		390,327,795,439	100%
liliana.duarte	0 B		29,920,131,360	15%

@mammasitta · Dec 4 '17

You got it !!! 
1+1 
😉

properties (22)

`post_id`	19,485,224
`author`	mammasitta
`permlink`	re-denmarkguy-re-lilianaduarte-re-mammasitta-re-denmarkguy-are-upvote-bots-necessarily-the-enemy-of-quality-content-20171204t231033539z
`category`	zappl
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["zappl"]}"
`created`	2017-12-04 23:10:33
`last_update`	2017-12-04 23:10:33
`depth`	4
`children`	0
`net_rshares`	0
`last_payout`	2017-12-11 23:10:33
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	22
`author_reputation`	119,919,245,915,690
`root_title`	"Are Upvote Bots Necessarily the Enemy of Quality Content?"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000

@liliana.duarte · Dec 5 '17

Despite those abusers, it probably would be much fairer for sure!!

properties (22)

`post_id`	19,575,237
`author`	liliana.duarte
`permlink`	re-denmarkguy-re-lilianaduarte-re-mammasitta-re-denmarkguy-are-upvote-bots-necessarily-the-enemy-of-quality-content-20171205t230714279z
`category`	zappl
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["zappl"]}"
`created`	2017-12-05 23:07:18
`last_update`	2017-12-05 23:07:18
`depth`	4
`children`	0
`net_rshares`	0
`last_payout`	2017-12-12 23:07:18
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	66
`author_reputation`	70,794,578,438,414
`root_title`	"Are Upvote Bots Necessarily the Enemy of Quality Content?"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000