Get a $13.00 Upvote and Your Post Resteemed to My 2 Accounts @a-0-0 and @a-a-a with 72,500+ Followers. Send 3 SBD with Your post URL in MEMO to @a-0-0

really agree with you opinion.

It is indeed the boys in the picture below.

Another point is that the ones above aren't alone.  They are working as a team.  They are trying to overcome obstacles (mostly imagined) and getting stronger.

Every school shooter is shouting, "look at me, do not ignore me".

And what does society do?  Drugs them and ignores them some more.

----

You can tell that boys who grew up with toy guns, then BB guns, then a 22... have never gone on a school shooting.  Because, these boys, if they ever decided to shoot up a school, would build themselves a blind and pick off kids from a distance.  The numbers of fatalities would be WAY higher.  But, we can't talk about such things.

The NRA gets the blame, when they should actually get the praise.

Strange because as a kid I played with toy guns, as a teenager I wore makeup as part of pop culture, but partly due to the fact we have tight gun control, and partly because Im well adjusted, I didnt shoot anyone!
Neither of the groups in your pic are more likely than the other to commit crime. Its sad you fall for idiotic facebook memes.

> They may settle with a modern man in their 30s when they’re attractiveness and best days are behind them, but A) They’ll still cheat on the side if the possibility of doing so presents itself, and B) That’s only if the guys even make it into their 30s before committing suicide or a mass shooting due to depression caused by failure and loneliness.

I’ve always thought this but never said it out loud or seen it written stark in front of me, it’s so true that those women in that category will actually do that; must be a genetic spread your code instinct?? All your points are 100% true it is the ostracized-beta-doesn’t like normal masculine things-was “odd” as a child male that becomes the evil we see today, not the prized and adored rampant male sexuality we see plastered across our faces every single day of our lives 

Agree. Lack of testo in men cause mental illness. Social engineering (telling ur kids that they are toxic) is another cause. Most Boys growing up now are confused betamales. And the girls prefer the chads or the higher testo immigrants.

White boys are just confused self hating betas trying to inpress girls with their agreableness and sjw nonsense. Of course - the whole feminism welcome migrants stuff is just one giant collective shit test from white women.

Hmm, this argument assumes that all of these boys are heterosexual. Which may or may not be the case. In my experience, the boys below have no trouble getting attention from girls. How many mass shooters have been masters of applying makeup?

White supremacist beliefs, feeling entitled to sex, and history of domestic violence seem to be better predictors of the likeliness to become a mass-shooter. Sounds a lot like toxic masculinity to me. But I know you don’t believe that exists. 

Do you think proper gun training for the incels who are not masculine enough in your opinion would have prevented these shootings? Do you really think the makeup boys are potential school shooters?

Be careful here. It seems that most shooters, at schools or elsewhere, are depressed, and medication makes the problem worse. Unless the person below is FORCED/ strongly "encouraged" to act like the pic shows, he is unlikely to become a shooter

Or, get this, it's not going to be either of them because the chances of a person actually becoming a school shooter slim to none. Also lmfao @ children holding weapons of any kind being associated with "masculinity". Sure, they miiiiiight not be school shooters, but they'll probably be cops, or military, or some other toxic and oppressive position of power where people can get away with murder or have a justification to treat others like garbage. Yeah, I can do stereotypes, too :)  
  
The real fact of the matter is the root of the problem, if anything, is isolation and treating others like they're "different" and thus bad. I can guarantee that there is not a single shred of percentage difference in effeminate vs masculine men being school shooters, but instead loners vs people that are accepted.

Not taking the two pictures literally...

I agree that the shooters will likely be from the pool of "outsiders" from the bottom photos. It won't be because they dress up and act like girls. It will be because they are mentally ill (as in, real psychological problems), socially awkward (not able to maintain healthy interpersonal relationships), and/or just not suitably adjusted to society/reality (are fed too much bullshit about what "normal" is or how everything/everyone is against them, etc.).  

It's the maladjusted and mentally ill that commit these crimes. 

There's nothing abnormal about kids playing with toy guns or even learning how to use actual firearms. Learning about these things or practicing with them to improve ones skills is nothing more than human nature...curiosity, knowledge, the ability to defend oneself, the will to survive. Acquiring skills for self-defense or using tools that you enjoy is nothing to be ashamed of and nothing to vilify.

If there were no guns, would people still blame bows and arrows for mass murders? Would it be scary to see young boys playing with toy swords or learning hand-to-hand combat? Would a slingshot cause panic in parents/adults? Of course not...at least not for normal, mentally-fit people. 

For the panicked, the maladjusted, the deniers of reality, the feeble-minded or physically weak - this could be the scariest thing imaginable. 

We should not cater to them and their irrational fears. It is not the irrational that ought to dictate behavior for the rest of us. Our reason, our ability to acquire, accumulate, and pass on inter-generational knowledge is what sets us apart from the irrational beasts of nature. Why do we allow those among us with short memories and illogical/contradictory views to tell the rest of us how we ought to act, knowing that *they* are indeed the ones who are oblivious, unreasonable, and *wrong?*

Mass murderers are mentally ill people. And they kill with whatever tools are available to them, whether it's a knife, a truck, a gun, bombs, chemical weapons, or the ability to control a nation's economics or food supply. They didn't become mass murderers because they played with toys. They became mass murderers by trying to live outside of reality - by learning that their world does not cater to their illogical whims and faulty beliefs. They became mass murderers because they rejected the world as it is and found no other way to understand this rejection...and, in fact, believe that the world has rejected them instead. (And it likely had, but it is their failure to adjust/cope with reality.)

The vilification of tools and those who use them (in a non-aggressive nature) only does one thing: **_It creates more distortions of reality...more irrational fears...more outsiders._**

Eventually, it may become a self-fulfilling prophecy. Vilify those who use guns. Make them feel unaccepted and abnormal. Make what is perfectly rational into behavior that is socially unacceptable. And then sit back and watch as these otherwise normal people are pushed to their mental breaking points because the truly mentally-ill and maladjusted are dictating social norms. 

I mean...it's not like this doesn't already happen in a variety of ways. Is there any wonder why so many people are depressed? When human nature becomes taboo and people are made to feel disgusted with themselves or just can't figure out what's "wrong" with them (because there *isn't* anything wrong with them), what else can we expect than to see mass psychology completely break down?

Is this not basically the recorded history of mankind? And are we (in general) just not capable of recognizing it?

Going down a weird rabbit hole with this post. I started to think that the only flaw with this statement is the females who are more masculine have no problems with integrating into society. IE no females are mass shooters. So it really is about the tribe not valuing a feminist male. Its kinda pathetic we still think so primitive. We have 🤖's to do our defending these days. So if it is about sex deprived males why is it happening now in time. Sex is more available these days. Then it made me think about people who pay for sex when people are giving it out for... well almost nothing. Then I thought about vote buying. Vote buying is kinda like paying for sex. The question is, are the people who run the vote 🤖, pimps or hookers?

giving boys the freedom to be themselves is not weakness. being feminine is not a weakness. the boys who have shot up schools have done so out of illness - insanity - and a lack of appropriate gun control. just because the boys in the bottom picture make you uncomfortable doesn't mean they aren't happy, well socialized, positive members of society.

You're wrong and a bad person.

So true even if those "boys" below don't become false flag shooters they will probably become libtards

![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRY55yJZ2FyCvqAFTG2Pa2FNDDzWTkn7S9b6rdrujaYKc/image.png)

nice

This is the dark side of modern civilization.

So sweet

WTF.