I have an acquaintance who had trouble conceiving and it took a few years for them to have a child. Now, if anyone makes a joke faking pregnancy, she launches into a rant on Facebook about how insensitive it is to those who have trouble or can't conceive at all.<div class="pull-right">https://i.imgur.com/vEdKIbt.jpg</div>

The other day in chat there was a conversation about someone who got injured and a joke was made about the wording used and the topic, and again there was an argument about how it is wrong to make fun of people's problems.

I understand their emotions but, I disagree strongly with their positions. What is *wrong* is to force people to behave in order to protect one's own lack of emotional control. What is *wrong* is to suppress people's opinions and humor because it is not in line with one's own views. What is *wrong* is to assume that those that make jokes about such things do not understand such things. 

Everyone wants to stand up and fight for the rights and condemn those who repress free speech, until their own feelings get hurt. The interesting thing about the second one is that they are an advocate for decentralization but, when it comes to emotions, they want to be protected, they want everyone to bow down to the authority that is their own ego.

The world is a little bit of a mess if people haven't noticed, and a large part of that mess is caused by every person wanting to be emotionally protected no matter their position, no matter their behaviour. This has lead to a situation where most people do not have the self-awareness and personal tools to deal with their own reactions to events.

So, instead of taking the time to look at themselves, untangle their emotional web, heal their wounds so they no longer have power over them; they censor others. They may even band together and form vigilante organisations to force submission, special interest groups to enact social change in order to protect their emotional weaknesses.

All so they don't actually have to face and come to terms with their own experiences. They want support for themselves though, they want pats on the back, their ego stroked. They want to build themselves up on the bodies of those who dare to speak, draw or write about anything they have deemed inappropriate, which is anything that *hurts* their feelings.

Censorship of the worst kind, that of people who do not understand the diversity of human experience and instead enforce their will onto others using their narrow view of life. They say their intentions are to protect the weak, but they are unwilling to admit that the weak is them.

The weak rarely need protecting, they need the chance to grow and to heal and this is not by avoiding their injuries as if they do not exist, it is by treating them at those points and giving the space to recover. That space is not an emotional 'safe space' where ignorance can reign, it is a space of self-discovery, creativity and curiosity.

This continual encouragement to avoid emotional conflict is creating an environment where people no longer have the emotional capabilities to handle even the smallest of reactions that arise from within them. There is no wonder the world is a mess. They are emotionally and intellectually stunted, they have grown in an environment without pressure to strengthen, gravity pull them to earth. 

But, they feel free to roam the internet with their diatribe and expect they are protected there too. Their coddled and siloed experiences of a false reality have not prepared them for the real world and when they start to falter, they claim unfairness and bigotry against this group or another and demand an authority repress them. So much for free speech.

It seems that free speech is only free for those in favor in the moment and that can change at anytime. Something these types of people fail to recognize. The seem to think that it will always be their group that is in the *right* and protected by all manners of laws and regulations. If the authority they rely on changes its flag, they are in trouble.

Resilience is a beautiful thing and if one can't remain resilient against words, how do they expect to face the real issues that pressure our world? How to ease the suffering of all of those millions, billions in some cases, when the only position that is important is the emotion security of their own ego? 

They do not want to see this reflected in their mirror though, so they choose not to look. They try to turn the mirror on those who would see humor in disaster and pain, who will laugh and joke about difficulties but, it will rarely work. 

Most of those willing to joke about life's challenges, have already experienced the trials, been in hardship, suffered enough that they have looked deep into a mirror already, faced their demons and healed. This is why they can smile, this is why they are emotionally free.

It is not they who are insensitive, it is those who look to oppress them.

Taraz
[ a Steemit original ]