RE: Steem Governance is Multiparty by teamsteem

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @ned/re-teamsteem-re-ned-re-ragnarokdel-re-teamsteem-re-ned-re-teamsteem-re-steemitblog-steem-governance-is-multiparty-20181017t131821812z

· @teamsteem ·
No.
properties (22)
post_id64,425,544
authorteamsteem
permlinkre-ned-re-teamsteem-re-ned-re-ragnarokdel-re-teamsteem-re-ned-re-teamsteem-re-steemitblog-steem-governance-is-multiparty-20181017t164156180z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2018-10-17 16:41:57
last_update2018-10-17 16:41:57
depth8
children10
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-10-24 16:41:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length3
author_reputation284,009,804,791,421
root_title"Steem Governance is Multiparty"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@ned · (edited)
Then note your “we” does not include me. Assuming despite refutation that I don’t know freedom is no one in this company is asinine. Beyond that there’s plenty of argument for DPoS that it doesn’t matter who Freedom or Blocktrades are. All the parties youve been complaining about are *Stakeholders*. DPoS is held together by Stakeholders’ Incentives and Pareto Principle despite Tragedy of the Commons. Understand that first.
properties (22)
post_id64,426,277
authorned
permlinkre-teamsteem-re-ned-re-teamsteem-re-ned-re-ragnarokdel-re-teamsteem-re-ned-re-teamsteem-re-steemitblog-steem-governance-is-multiparty-20181017t165707313z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2018-10-17 16:57:09
last_update2018-10-17 16:58:24
depth9
children9
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-10-24 16:57:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length426
author_reputation94,526,930,487,415
root_title"Steem Governance is Multiparty"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout0.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@teamsteem ·
What you know and what you've stated didn't invalidate any of the points I've made in my first comment. Also, I didn't complain about any Stakeholders. I've merely stated facts.
properties (22)
post_id64,430,529
authorteamsteem
permlinkre-ned-re-teamsteem-re-ned-re-teamsteem-re-ned-re-ragnarokdel-re-teamsteem-re-ned-re-teamsteem-re-steemitblog-steem-governance-is-multiparty-20181017t182322186z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2018-10-17 18:23:24
last_update2018-10-17 18:23:24
depth10
children8
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-10-24 18:23:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length177
author_reputation284,009,804,791,421
root_title"Steem Governance is Multiparty"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@ned ·
Is it a fact that it’s all an “issue” as you stated? I’ll stop bothering to respond to you if you believe you’re stating facts only while not doing that — that’s contradictory and a waste of my time.
properties (22)
post_id64,430,730
authorned
permlinkre-teamsteem-re-ned-re-teamsteem-re-ned-re-teamsteem-re-ned-re-ragnarokdel-re-teamsteem-re-ned-re-teamsteem-re-steemitblog-steem-governance-is-multiparty-20181017t182743981z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2018-10-17 18:27:45
last_update2018-10-17 18:27:45
depth11
children7
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-10-24 18:27:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length199
author_reputation94,526,930,487,415
root_title"Steem Governance is Multiparty"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout0.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000