What do I call you?  Cousin it?

You said I attacked you and said I was abusive, I pointed out that the curve is there to stop stake splitting, you argued the curve is there to make posts rewards even more unfair, I implored you to actually have a respectable discussion based on clear reasoning,  you responded with the effect of "Whatever it takes to undermine the idea of the curve I'll do it". When I previously asked you what do you think  the effect of a creation percentage change would be you ran away from any kind of discussion and yet in your *opinion* post you went to tie in  a change in curation as effecting bots, yet you didn't recognize the evident incentive of concentrating ones stake instead of having it delegated to 1 or  10 bots and the effect that would have on bots but think that the Curation change alone is responsible, or at least primarily, to dissuade bots,  when at best it's a supplement to the curve, which comes back to you equating that change as "I was here for the curve,  I know what the curve does,  it makes posts from whales 10x now", and had no interest in discussing that the curve is there to give concentrating stake into one account  the incentives it once had,  and stop in turn these bots, a point you had no intention of  discussing so you clearly didn't want to introduce the curve proposal with it. You don't give a fuck about community, you care about some investors speculating about Steem,  you think Steem is an experiment and have no problem justifying abuse as "what right do you have to say what others can and can't use their stake for!", and mocking the purpose of the reward pool and actually of Steem with the blatant disregard for supporting abuse while you've got the gall to present yourself as for community. Muh voturbation community, Muh care for discussion and clear reasoning, experiment Muh.