I think i completely understand the system. Me not agreeing with it is another thing entirely. 
SMTs will bring 1account/1vote. Thats exactly what Ned said. It will be a hybrid system at first, which i completely support but SMTs are a shift in the general philosophy. 

The bot accounts are a problem of course, but with reputation, age of account, plagiarism detection, in place we do not need to base 1account/1vote on the bare bones account existence. Its a matter of logistics at that point. 

What i see now is a system of Plutocracy and trickle down economics that has been shown to lead to complete failure. 
That system is imo in place here. That will not lead to any good in the middle or long term.

It will never happen, you mean that when Dan said that they were working on a moderation system apart from Curation that didn't resonate with one vote per person or you think moderation (justice) was going to be free market stake based implementation with the biggest wallets having a bigger say in moderation? 

You're about as committed to the site as your incessant defense for people doing whatever they want with their stake,  as you did when you attempted to defend htooms for Self Voting and equally their malicious flagging of fulltimegeek.  You are about as concerned with community as when you told me to my face that you'll do whatever you want to marginalize and attack ideas,  especially lying and playing the victim or simply spreading your toxic opinion which was based on outright lies and fabrication. Your a fake, a impostor, a complete 180 of what stands as integrity.

You have that right, especially considering he's not the one doing it.