I didn't call your opinion bullshit, in fact, if you understand what I'm trying to say, I'm really calling my own opinion bullshit. But, I was speaking generally about how some art is nonsensical without the justification created by an artist's context. Look at [Yves Klein's monochromatic works](https://www.moma.org/collection/works/80103), without context it's just a colour on a canvas, but with context it becomes a piece of art. The only reason I used the word "bullshit" is because it lead into that article I linked about a very interesting exhibition I went to where an artist used cow dung as a medium.

And, yes, Pollock is fantastic, I'm a fan of his work too. Abstract expressionism in general has been a major influence on my life, along with Dada, the surrealists, and the futurists, just to name a few. 

I'm just a fan of art, which is why I'm still keeping this conversation going. I'm having fun attempting to explain what constitutes art. In the strange landscape of this post-Warholian world we find ourselves inhabiting there is no way of ever truly being able to define "art", but we can certainly entertain ourselves by trying, haha.

Anyway, I'm sorry if I've offended you. I'm just trying to have a little fun.