Dear @Steemcurator01 and @Steemitblog,

At first glance the proposal is very interesting. I have always believed that there is a great potential in Steemit, one more oriented to the purpose of quality and contribution, be it in a recreational, educational, photographic, musical, literary etc. sense. This is a great opportunity for that talent, hidden in the shadows, to finally come to light. However, I do have a few concerns...

How to guarantee that these groups are not mistakenly centralized to the exclusion of good content? I am a witness that in many communities the potential of some users is ignored, appealing to incorrect concepts of interaction and originality.

If the same people from the past control these groups, how will there be a real change? The criteria of a curator should be oriented towards generating an integrating environment, where the contents are useful for both Steemit users and those who are outside this platform. Good posts are still being ignored... and the same people are thinking of nominating themselves again? Under this point, I think that ethics and results must be considered in order to contemplate a really profitable future for the rise of content on Steemit.

There are so many things to take into account to generate real support, that many times I am terrified that this will fall into the wrong hands. Although, I believe that this path is important to generate a real change.

Good content is being left behind... I hope that this initiative really works... for my part, I would love for Creative Writing to take on more force on Steemit. In any case, my humble perception is open to any group where this category is promoted.

Discord: soldieroffantasy#9743