Viewing a response to: @theycallmedan/should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050
I support the restoration of 50/50 rewards on a post (50% to the author, 50% to the curators). The change to 75% author rewards was extremely damaging, IMO, and led to excessive self-voting and finally to the bidbots we have today. I made a post on this issue a long time ago that covers my reasoning in depth: https://steemit.com/steem/@blocktrades/voting-abuse-and-ineffective-curation-a-proposal-for-blockchain-level-change I haven't voted in the poll, as the security of my active key is extremely important, but I would vote in favor of returning to 50/50 split, otherwise. As a side note, the display of stake-weighted voting seems broken on dpoll right now.
post_id | 73,656,777 |
---|---|
author | blocktrades |
permlink | re-theycallmedan-should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050-20190424t154051662z |
category | dpoll |
json_metadata | {"tags":["dpoll"],"links":["https:\/\/steemit.com\/steem\/@blocktrades\/voting-abuse-and-ineffective-curation-a-proposal-for-blockchain-level-change"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-04-24 15:40:51 |
last_update | 2019-04-24 15:40:51 |
depth | 1 |
children | 7 |
net_rshares | 3,162,734,790,054 |
last_payout | 2019-05-01 15:40:51 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 1.202 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.399 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 667 |
author_reputation | 321,119,490,936,483 |
root_title | "Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
bboyady | 0 | 18,328,420,367 | 100% | ||
therealwolf | 0 | 2,133,656,900,336 | 100% | ||
hashbrownhustla | 0 | 152,337,467 | 100% | ||
mixr | 0 | 930,627,719 | 5% | ||
theycallmedan | 0 | 1,007,883,033,020 | 3% | ||
ascorphat | 0 | 1,783,471,145 | 2.5% |
You should be able to send the operation manually without requiring to use your active key in steemconnect or keychain.
post_id | 73,663,761 |
---|---|
author | raycoms |
permlink | re-blocktrades-re-theycallmedan-should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050-20190424t183138120z |
category | dpoll |
json_metadata | {"tags":["dpoll"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-04-24 18:31:39 |
last_update | 2019-04-24 18:31:39 |
depth | 2 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-05-01 18:31:39 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 119 |
author_reputation | 120,534,427,956,805 |
root_title | "Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
Yup, it's possible to vote without keychain and Steemconnect. [Here](https://gist.github.com/emre/16e561b416de0e9f7fefc701e673d696) is a proof of concept.
post_id | 73,673,465 |
---|---|
author | emrebeyler |
permlink | re-raycoms-re-blocktrades-re-theycallmedan-should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050-20190424t235113726z |
category | dpoll |
json_metadata | {"tags":["dpoll"],"links":["https:\/\/gist.github.com\/emre\/16e561b416de0e9f7fefc701e673d696"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-04-24 23:51:15 |
last_update | 2019-04-24 23:51:15 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 4,289,091,676 |
last_payout | 2019-05-01 23:51:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 154 |
author_reputation | 319,480,565,467,431 |
root_title | "Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ismailkah | 0 | 4,289,091,676 | 25% |
> As a side note, the display of stake-weighted voting seems broken on dpoll right now. Thanks! I have identified the error in the logs. Will be fixed with the new release. It happens in rare cases - should be ok most of the time.
post_id | 73,673,481 |
---|---|
author | emrebeyler |
permlink | re-blocktrades-re-theycallmedan-should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050-20190424t235202592z |
category | dpoll |
json_metadata | {"tags":["dpoll"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-04-24 23:52:03 |
last_update | 2019-04-25 00:02:00 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 1,176,042,935,909 |
last_payout | 2019-05-01 23:52:03 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.440 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.144 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 231 |
author_reputation | 319,480,565,467,431 |
root_title | "Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
blocktrades | 0 | 1,171,774,928,764 | 1% | ||
ismailkah | 0 | 4,268,007,145 | 25% |
I don't as a rule self-vote in part because of the 75/25 split ... I definitely will should it become 50/50
post_id | 73,836,243 |
---|---|
author | shadowspub |
permlink | re-blocktrades-re-theycallmedan-should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050-20190428t101137620z |
category | dpoll |
json_metadata | {"tags":["dpoll"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-04-28 10:11:39 |
last_update | 2019-04-28 10:11:39 |
depth | 2 |
children | 3 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-05-05 10:11:39 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 107 |
author_reputation | 122,086,225,405,906 |
root_title | "Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
Judicious self-voting was originally intended as part of the system: having more stake meant you could bring attention to your ideas/messages. This would also give users a reason to accumulate Steem (there has to be a reason to hold Steem, otherwise it won't have any value, and there will be no reward pool to speak of). On the other hand, if you self-voted on entirely silly things, the idea is that you would get downvoted.
post_id | 73,849,968 |
---|---|
author | blocktrades |
permlink | re-shadowspub-re-blocktrades-re-theycallmedan-should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050-20190428t155817187z |
category | dpoll |
json_metadata | {"tags":["dpoll"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-04-28 15:58:15 |
last_update | 2019-04-28 15:58:15 |
depth | 3 |
children | 2 |
net_rshares | 156,193,573 |
last_payout | 2019-05-05 15:58:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 426 |
author_reputation | 321,119,490,936,483 |
root_title | "Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
moeknows | 0 | 0 | 100% | ||
hashbrownhustla | 0 | 156,193,573 | 100% |
Such a simple concept yet so hard to understand. @blocktrades, concerning the reason to hold Steem, I think commerce is the best reason of all. We need to get more businesses selling everyday things on Steem.
post_id | 74,229,278 |
---|---|
author | moeknows |
permlink | re-blocktrades-re-shadowspub-re-blocktrades-re-theycallmedan-should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050-20190505t182750628z |
category | dpoll |
json_metadata | {"tags":["dpoll"],"users":["blocktrades"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-05-05 18:27:51 |
last_update | 2019-05-05 18:27:51 |
depth | 4 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 40,446,546,763 |
last_payout | 2019-05-12 18:27:51 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 210 |
author_reputation | 9,722,496,103,749 |
root_title | "Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
smartvote | 0 | 40,446,546,763 | 0.68% |