RE: Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50? by blocktrades

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @theycallmedan/should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050

· @blocktrades ·
$1.60
I support the restoration of 50/50 rewards on a post (50% to the author, 50% to the curators). The change to 75% author rewards was extremely damaging, IMO, and led to excessive self-voting and finally to the bidbots we have today.

I made a post on this issue a long time ago that covers my reasoning in depth: https://steemit.com/steem/@blocktrades/voting-abuse-and-ineffective-curation-a-proposal-for-blockchain-level-change

I haven't voted in the poll, as the security of my active key is extremely important, but I would vote in favor of returning to 50/50 split, otherwise.

As a side note, the display of stake-weighted voting seems broken on dpoll right now.
👍  , , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id73,656,777
authorblocktrades
permlinkre-theycallmedan-should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050-20190424t154051662z
categorydpoll
json_metadata{"tags":["dpoll"],"links":["https:\/\/steemit.com\/steem\/@blocktrades\/voting-abuse-and-ineffective-curation-a-proposal-for-blockchain-level-change"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-04-24 15:40:51
last_update2019-04-24 15:40:51
depth1
children7
net_rshares3,162,734,790,054
last_payout2019-05-01 15:40:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.202 SBD
curator_payout_value0.399 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length667
author_reputation321,119,490,936,483
root_title"Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (6)
@raycoms ·
You should be able to send the operation manually without requiring to use your active key in steemconnect or keychain.
properties (22)
post_id73,663,761
authorraycoms
permlinkre-blocktrades-re-theycallmedan-should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050-20190424t183138120z
categorydpoll
json_metadata{"tags":["dpoll"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-04-24 18:31:39
last_update2019-04-24 18:31:39
depth2
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2019-05-01 18:31:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length119
author_reputation120,534,427,956,805
root_title"Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@emrebeyler ·
Yup, it's possible to vote without keychain and Steemconnect. [Here](https://gist.github.com/emre/16e561b416de0e9f7fefc701e673d696) is a proof of concept.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id73,673,465
authoremrebeyler
permlinkre-raycoms-re-blocktrades-re-theycallmedan-should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050-20190424t235113726z
categorydpoll
json_metadata{"tags":["dpoll"],"links":["https:\/\/gist.github.com\/emre\/16e561b416de0e9f7fefc701e673d696"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-04-24 23:51:15
last_update2019-04-24 23:51:15
depth3
children0
net_rshares4,289,091,676
last_payout2019-05-01 23:51:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length154
author_reputation319,480,565,467,431
root_title"Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@emrebeyler · (edited)
$0.58
> As a side note, the display of stake-weighted voting seems broken on dpoll right now.

Thanks! I have identified the error in the logs. Will be fixed with the new release. It happens in rare cases - should be ok most of the time.
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id73,673,481
authoremrebeyler
permlinkre-blocktrades-re-theycallmedan-should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050-20190424t235202592z
categorydpoll
json_metadata{"tags":["dpoll"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-04-24 23:52:03
last_update2019-04-25 00:02:00
depth2
children0
net_rshares1,176,042,935,909
last_payout2019-05-01 23:52:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.440 SBD
curator_payout_value0.144 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length231
author_reputation319,480,565,467,431
root_title"Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@shadowspub ·
I don't as a rule self-vote in part because of the 75/25 split ... I definitely will should it become 50/50
properties (22)
post_id73,836,243
authorshadowspub
permlinkre-blocktrades-re-theycallmedan-should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050-20190428t101137620z
categorydpoll
json_metadata{"tags":["dpoll"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-04-28 10:11:39
last_update2019-04-28 10:11:39
depth2
children3
net_rshares0
last_payout2019-05-05 10:11:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length107
author_reputation122,086,225,405,906
root_title"Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@blocktrades ·
Judicious self-voting was originally intended as part of the system: having more stake meant you could bring attention to your ideas/messages. This would also give users a reason to accumulate Steem (there has to be a reason to hold Steem, otherwise it won't have any value, and there will be no reward pool to speak of). On the other hand, if you self-voted on entirely silly things, the idea is that you would get downvoted.
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id73,849,968
authorblocktrades
permlinkre-shadowspub-re-blocktrades-re-theycallmedan-should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050-20190428t155817187z
categorydpoll
json_metadata{"tags":["dpoll"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-04-28 15:58:15
last_update2019-04-28 15:58:15
depth3
children2
net_rshares156,193,573
last_payout2019-05-05 15:58:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length426
author_reputation321,119,490,936,483
root_title"Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@moeknows ·
Such a simple concept yet so hard to understand.

@blocktrades, concerning the reason to hold Steem, I think commerce is the best reason of all.  We need to get more businesses selling everyday things on Steem.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id74,229,278
authormoeknows
permlinkre-blocktrades-re-shadowspub-re-blocktrades-re-theycallmedan-should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050-20190505t182750628z
categorydpoll
json_metadata{"tags":["dpoll"],"users":["blocktrades"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-05-05 18:27:51
last_update2019-05-05 18:27:51
depth4
children1
net_rshares40,446,546,763
last_payout2019-05-12 18:27:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length210
author_reputation9,722,496,103,749
root_title"Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)