Viewing a response to: @theycallmedan/should-we-raise-curation-rewards-from-2575-to-5050
Voted for - No No because the Author does the work on the content. The whole argument of value on Steemit is based about the value of content,so I don't understand why you'd want to give half of the content writers pay to the audience. think 25% is a fair take for the audience & ensures money circulates back into the ecosystem. Oh, & I don't even post anymore so this doesn't affect me. The only problem that anyone should be worried about here, is how lame Steemit has become. Audiences are bored and so I don't even tell people about this place anymore, it smells of old socks & dungeon-dwelling programmers
post_id | 73,613,212 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
author | senseiteekay | ||||||||||||
permlink | e5fa07a1-4a17-4bd0-a59d-1680695b1661 | ||||||||||||
category | dpoll | ||||||||||||
json_metadata | {"tags":["dpoll","poll"],"app":"dpoll\/0.0.2","content_type":"poll_vote","votes":["No"]} | ||||||||||||
created | 2019-04-23 21:56:36 | ||||||||||||
last_update | 2019-04-23 21:56:36 | ||||||||||||
depth | 1 | ||||||||||||
children | 20 | ||||||||||||
net_rshares | 612,635,141,361 | ||||||||||||
last_payout | 2019-04-30 21:56:36 | ||||||||||||
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 | ||||||||||||
total_payout_value | 0.208 SBD | ||||||||||||
curator_payout_value | 0.025 SBD | ||||||||||||
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD | ||||||||||||
promoted | 0.000 SBD | ||||||||||||
body_length | 617 | ||||||||||||
author_reputation | 37,153,522,909,717 | ||||||||||||
root_title | "Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?" | ||||||||||||
beneficiaries |
| ||||||||||||
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD | ||||||||||||
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 | ||||||||||||
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
senseiteekay | 0 | 189,711,418 | 100% | ||
krnel | 0 | 45,036,733,729 | 3% | ||
jaki01 | 0 | 79,132,006,902 | 5% | ||
edb | 0 | 17,801,909,590 | 100% | ||
lordneroo | 0 | 25,627,251,324 | 20% | ||
valued-customer | 0 | 9,624,402,931 | 25% | ||
lordbutterfly | 0 | 98,741,888,271 | 100% | ||
bidesign | 0 | 3,725,288,508 | 100% | ||
mixr | 0 | 969,118,757 | 5% | ||
theycallmedan | 0 | 331,786,829,931 | 1% |
If you want to know what I think I made a video here with open discussion. https://steemit.com/dtube/@theycallmedan/ptb813uc
post_id | 73,613,266 |
---|---|
author | theycallmedan |
permlink | re-senseiteekay-e5fa07a1-4a17-4bd0-a59d-1680695b1661-20190423t215817781z |
category | dpoll |
json_metadata | {"tags":["dpoll"],"links":["https:\/\/steemit.com\/dtube\/@theycallmedan\/ptb813uc"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-04-23 21:58:24 |
last_update | 2019-04-23 21:58:24 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 8,567,005,909 |
last_payout | 2019-04-30 21:58:24 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 124 |
author_reputation | 402,202,202,441,317 |
root_title | "Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 0 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
alamin33 | 0 | 48,394,908 | 17% | ||
urme33 | 0 | 8,518,611,001 | 17% |
Yeah... this seems imbalanced to me... 50/50... because clicking a mouse button means you should get more and the author less. Not all authors are the same or put in the same amount of work, but anyways, clicking a mouse button, or autovoting and doing nothing, needs to be kept in mind. If the voter likes the content, great, then they get what they wanted: content. Getting curation rewards is a nice extra when all you need to do is click a mouse button and nothing else, even not look at the content if you don't want to... ;) Just click a button to get some rewards back for that action... I like to look at the work being done, and creating content demands more work than clicking a mouse button.
post_id | 73,613,443 |
---|---|
author | krnel |
permlink | re-senseiteekay-e5fa07a1-4a17-4bd0-a59d-1680695b1661-20190423t220408385z |
category | dpoll |
json_metadata | {"tags":["dpoll"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-04-23 22:04:09 |
last_update | 2019-04-23 22:17:27 |
depth | 2 |
children | 16 |
net_rshares | 456,000,839,956 |
last_payout | 2019-04-30 22:04:09 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.171 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.056 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 702 |
author_reputation | 954,992,586,021,436 |
root_title | "Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 0 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
senseiteekay | 0 | 1,747,915,050 | 100% | ||
jaki01 | 0 | 84,459,477,552 | 5% | ||
edb | 0 | 17,445,555,629 | 100% | ||
valued-customer | 0 | 9,576,206,054 | 25% | ||
angryman | 0 | 9,859,130,113 | 50% | ||
theycallmedan | 0 | 332,912,555,558 | 1% |
Ya I don't disagree with that. I just point out why curate when I can sell my vote? If you want curation to happen at scale then you must incentive curators to upvote others and not incentive self upvoting. But maybe selling votes and self upvoting being top of the list isn't a bad idea, not saying know. If people are willing to buy votes then there is demand for the eyeballs here.
post_id | 73,613,954 |
---|---|
author | theycallmedan |
permlink | re-krnel-re-senseiteekay-e5fa07a1-4a17-4bd0-a59d-1680695b1661-20190423t221947458z |
category | dpoll |
json_metadata | {"tags":["dpoll"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-04-23 22:19:51 |
last_update | 2019-04-23 22:19:51 |
depth | 3 |
children | 14 |
net_rshares | 83,720,411,892 |
last_payout | 2019-04-30 22:19:51 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.031 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.005 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 385 |
author_reputation | 402,202,202,441,317 |
root_title | "Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 0 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
krnel | 0 | 75,258,388,774 | 5% | ||
urme33 | 0 | 8,462,023,118 | 17% |
Changing to 50/50 would just get the vote buying to change how they charge for what % to 'ROI' give, while the delegators and owners would make even more than they do now. That's the outcome I see. Vote buying would continue,a s long as they adjusted and still provided a positive return for the amount of money sent out. If people want to buy votes, it's not about eyeballs. It's about making more money. Thats why the bots calculate their votes based on money sent to give an ROI that's positive, not negative. Would people use ocdb if the return was negative? Would they use any of the many other bots? Maybe a few would, but that would be the people who are willing to actually spend money to get more eyeballs by reaching a high enough payout to get the eyeballs (like $100). Buying votes to get your post at $10, $20, or even $50 isn't getting anyone any more eyeballs. You have to spend a lot more. That's when it has an effect on the trending page. The majority who buy votes are doing it to get an ROI in a rigged voting scheme-platform where you can just pay to get more rewards. THAT is what makes Steem a sad joke imo. And you curate, or anyone else, because you care to reward content you value, which is how the whole system is supposed to work (and in exchange you get rewards too, curation rewards). That's when the platform gains more value, when the content is rewarded because its valued by curators. Again, vote sellers just want to make easy money by doing 0-actions, if they cared about rewarding content they would be doing that. And vote buyers want more money because curators aren't curating them, they have to buy votes to get rewards, not earn them.
post_id | 73,614,248 |
---|---|
author | krnel |
permlink | re-theycallmedan-re-krnel-re-senseiteekay-e5fa07a1-4a17-4bd0-a59d-1680695b1661-20190423t223214251z |
category | dpoll |
json_metadata | {"tags":["dpoll"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-04-23 22:32:15 |
last_update | 2019-04-23 22:36:45 |
depth | 4 |
children | 13 |
net_rshares | 554,475,377,986 |
last_payout | 2019-04-30 22:32:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.209 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.041 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 1,680 |
author_reputation | 954,992,586,021,436 |
root_title | "Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 0 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
bryan-imhoff | 0 | 59,801,074,668 | 25% | ||
jaki01 | 0 | 90,561,076,097 | 5% | ||
markkujantunen | 0 | 26,088,128,650 | 16% | ||
valued-customer | 0 | 9,469,460,407 | 25% | ||
phoneinf | 0 | 34,474,773,630 | 100% | ||
theycallmedan | 0 | 334,080,864,534 | 1% |
It's not 50/50 in that sense: there's one author and tons of curators on popular posts. The author will pretty much always get more rewards, unless its one big curator doing the voting.
post_id | 73,656,299 |
---|---|
author | blocktrades |
permlink | re-krnel-re-senseiteekay-e5fa07a1-4a17-4bd0-a59d-1680695b1661-20190424t153132205z |
category | dpoll |
json_metadata | {"tags":["dpoll"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-04-24 15:31:30 |
last_update | 2019-04-24 15:31:30 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 335,121,909,909 |
last_payout | 2019-05-01 15:31:30 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.126 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.041 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 185 |
author_reputation | 321,119,490,936,483 |
root_title | "Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
hashbrownhustla | 0 | 156,193,573 | 100% | ||
theycallmedan | 0 | 334,965,716,336 | 1% |
If a shop lowers the price on their product and ended up with more sales, is that a loss? > is how lame Steemit has become. We're talking about Steem the blockchain not Steemit the website. Also, I believe @theycallmedan is doing this exactly because Steem has become "lame". the way things are now does not work and it's high time we explore this proposal that has been talked about for the pass 2-3 years.
post_id | 73,622,446 |
---|---|
author | awesomianist |
permlink | re-senseiteekay-e5fa07a1-4a17-4bd0-a59d-1680695b1661-20190424t023304508z |
category | dpoll |
json_metadata | {"tags":["dpoll"],"users":["theycallmedan"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-04-24 02:33:03 |
last_update | 2019-04-24 02:33:03 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-05-01 02:33:03 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 409 |
author_reputation | 24,736,219,916,386 |
root_title | "Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
No the User make the Work. If you have none read your Stuff is like worthless. Look in google if you are on Site 2. Its worthless. So people help you to share and reward your Voice have more Work. Think about if you real curate, you have to read a Ton of Stuff and Reward the best one. IF you a a Author you want people to read your Stuff.
post_id | 73,633,296 |
---|---|
author | freddio |
permlink | re-senseiteekay-e5fa07a1-4a17-4bd0-a59d-1680695b1661-20190424t072550679z |
category | dpoll |
json_metadata | {"tags":["dpoll"],"app":"steempeak\/1.9.8"} |
created | 2019-04-24 07:25:45 |
last_update | 2019-04-24 07:25:45 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-05-01 07:25:45 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 341 |
author_reputation | 11,277,743,744,431 |
root_title | "Should We Raise Curation Rewards From 25/75 To 50/50?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |