sorry my friend i am new one in steemit

i ma little but about steemit..please withdraw your flag..next i am keep concious...😭😭😭

i think it's harmful...for steemit...community

i have seen his blog.

thank's for sharing

Everybody has their own strategy. I see why he does it and I see why you think it careless and not good for Steem.

I'm not sure I have enough experience to know either way.

@greenman just awsome

you do it right when you reveal such ways of enriching individual users ... in order for the community to develop, everyone should contribute, share valuable information .... For your valuable information, thank you

I just checked him out and found this comment of you: 


![Bildschirmfoto 2017-12-13 um 20.33.50.png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmPihEGPR7sTD5cDxtRb6f83UyL5ofgvdr4dsYHGY5Mps7/Bildschirmfoto%202017-12-13%20um%2020.33.50.png)

The second point on that is exactly the thing.. 
I can understand that he wants to profit from the current situation going on here on steem, who doesn't want to? 
But unfortunately this is definitely a way to damage and to threaten the whole platform.. 
Especially if more 'whales' or users in generell with high Steem power start using this. 
This can cause a chain reaction which definitely can be deadly..

I also give genuine comments portions of apreciation. not that much yet but always something

This is a very tricky situation, not so simple like spammers, over-bot abusers or friendly upvotes.  
On one hand, @Greenman writes big posts about himself, his life and crypto experience, which sometimes is very interesting​ to read. He also upvotes quite a lot of users, who write comments on his posts.  Usually, these are minnows with no money who are trying to get a big upvote. 
The bad part in this situation is that it looks like he does not read comments at all or at least this is just my impression and there are lot of spammy comments like "hey nice post" , "well done follow me ", etc. 
As results we see a shit tone of comments (some good and the rest shitty ones).  
Now, on the other hand, he is replying to those comments and upvotes himself, which looks bad, but makes some sort of sense. He is compensating his upvotes to comments of others so it would look fair. 
Now the question is ,  would it be the same situation when you write in someone other's post a comment and upvote yourself?  Is self-upvoting allowed or not? Where is a line? 
Personally, I think it looks a bit as overuse of your power. You can reply in your own post comments couple of times and selfupvote, but replying to every shitty comment and writing the same, well not so good. On the other hand nothing prohibits to do that. Self-upvoting your comments in others posts would be almost the same and would look ok to most people in Steemit. 
My verdict - the amount of comments self-upvotes in your own post  should be smaller. Quality of the comments should be higher.  Then it will look better.

Best thing will be to read all the comment. And only up vote which looks relevant to the post and who really read the post.

there are already a lot of people on steem purely for the purpose of trying to profit. And to be honest - when you earn 10€ per hour working in RL and you get on steem 30$ per single upvote - it's hard to say no. But I understand more and more that giving upvotes can be profitable too - because if you interact on steem and not only with yourself - you get much more back.

@transisto,
As per our last discussion, your point is correct! But for me @greenman did not post regularly and if he post he also upvoted people who interact with his posts and as you said he also upvoted his comments as well!
For me it's not an unfair one! He helped a lot of minnows by rewarding them, and once a week (probably) we can see his post in steemit! And he never made a simple post, if he post something, he made it very well! So, I hope you all should understand it's not a very unfair thing! (I also respect what you said)
Hope this flag thing and arguments will not lead a power down of him and for me, he is not draining the reward pool, he just blast his SP most probably once a week! 

People might have different thoughts! But this is how I feel his work! And hope pretty smile on our face could fix this argument in a nice way!

Cheers~

@transisto doesn’t seem like a great thing for the overall good of the community. Specially for those (like me) who really want to see this community prosper 🤞 Best wishes, - @splendorhub

Wow, that should not be allowed, steemit should do something about it...

To be honest, He attracts people with that behaviour. I also reacted a couple of times and noticed that he values a normal reaction and with some depth more. I guess for beginners starting with 0 steem power this is a way of collecting some steem power. I started myself 6 months ago with 0. And now I am happy were I am. But now I am also trying to do steemit promotions to get more people on the platform. There are many other who just post a picture and never vote on quality replies they get. They only think about themselves. Many different people in this world.. I will keep contributing to the platform.

If the system rewards him for behaving this way, then there's no reason for him to stop. Can't blame someone for trying to make money, even if his actions aren't great for the community at large. If you don't like somebody's content or behavior, you can always flag them. But if the system rewards low-effort behavior like this, then the best thing to do would be to figure out how to change the Steem ecosystem to prevent it. (Personally, I think self-voting shouldn't be a thing for exactly this reason but if it benefits me I'll continue to do it)

Or maybe if self-votes costed much more than regular votes? Unclear what would be the best way to approach this issue.