Viewing a response to: @steemitblog/patience-with-the-hardfork-there-must-be-consensus
Appreciate the update... does seem like there should be a way to move forward with the items that were NOT "controversial" (or that most witnesses had no significant issues with) and hold off on the items requiring further discussion and changes... make a "17.1" a month down the road... not sure the *"all or nothing"* approach serves the community best.
| post_id | 2,198,401 |
|---|---|
| author | denmarkguy |
| permlink | re-steemitblog-patience-with-the-hardfork-there-must-be-consensus-20170320t150042150z |
| category | hardfork-17 |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["hardfork-17"]}" |
| created | 2017-03-20 15:00:45 |
| last_update | 2017-03-20 15:00:45 |
| depth | 1 |
| children | 0 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
| last_payout | 2017-04-20 18:59:30 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 355 |
| author_reputation | 588,843,655,355,588 |
| root_title | "Patience with the Hardfork - There Must Be Consensus" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |