Viewing a response to: @apsu/re-tarazkp-re-apsu-re-tarazkp-break-my-bones-looking-at-and-taking-criticism-20171122t105035433z
as replied down below, imagine reading a scientific journal and coming across information that contradicts your held beliefs. This is criticism too but is rarely met with rage or depression. Yes, the delivery method can affect but, my question is: should it? Especially if there is value in the new information obtained.
post_id | 18,407,348 |
---|---|
author | tarazkp |
permlink | re-apsu-re-tarazkp-re-apsu-re-tarazkp-break-my-bones-looking-at-and-taking-criticism-20171122t110451655z |
category | philosophy |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["philosophy"]}" |
created | 2017-11-22 11:04:51 |
last_update | 2017-11-22 11:04:51 |
depth | 4 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-11-29 11:04:51 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 322 |
author_reputation | 1,394,583,249,195,743 |
root_title | "Break my bones: Looking at and taking criticism" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
It should affect, because it helps us remember even in criticism: good manners and being polite will never do any harm. This is why rarely on scientific journals the new information, conflicting with the old information, is presented as "YOU OTHER SCIENCE FOLKS FUCKING SUCK, DICKHEADS!" but are presented in a proper manner.
post_id | 18,408,003 |
---|---|
author | apsu |
permlink | re-tarazkp-re-apsu-re-tarazkp-re-apsu-re-tarazkp-break-my-bones-looking-at-and-taking-criticism-20171122t111445062z |
category | philosophy |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["philosophy"]}" |
created | 2017-11-22 11:14:51 |
last_update | 2017-11-22 11:14:51 |
depth | 5 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 19,841,883,738 |
last_payout | 2017-11-29 11:14:51 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.035 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.012 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 326 |
author_reputation | 34,940,839,343,940 |
root_title | "Break my bones: Looking at and taking criticism" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
tarazkp | 0 | 19,841,883,738 | 6% |