RE: Steem gets more coverage by steevc

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @arthur-grafo8/q17sbn

· @steevc ·
I am generally against imposing more rules on Steem. Who gets to decide what accounts are allowed to do? The system we have is more a mix of anarchy and rampant capitalism where the rich have the power. I do work with SFR to deal with blatant abuse of the system and that can work. I do not downvote for difference of opinion, but people are free to do that. That can drive some away, but do we want to compromise the freedom? I want to see all sorts of people here. I do read articles and I value those who actually read and comment on mine even if we disagree. 
properties (22)
post_id81,862,671
authorsteevc
permlinkre-arthur-grafo8-20191119t12547486z
categorystee
json_metadata{"tags":["esteem"],"app":"esteem\/2.2.2-mobile","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem.app"}
created2019-11-19 12:54:12
last_update2019-11-19 12:54:12
depth2
children3
net_rshares0
last_payout2019-11-26 12:54:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length563
author_reputation273,317,013,544,223
root_title"Steem gets more coverage "
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight300
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@enforcer48 · (edited)
$0.05
Content creators (journalists in this case), can come here if they want. The important thing is the people that follow them over.

It's the same idea as bringing companies/businesses over to use features of the chain (i.e. free transactions). Businesses don't need to create content here. By virtue of their presence, hopefully their consumer-base would follow.

It's dumb as hell when people continually say "we need to onboard the masses". No, we don't. We onboard people who can bring the masses because they have a following.

Importing a "Pewdiepie" is infinitely more valuable than having several Jerry Banfields who bring in questionable characters. Similarly, having egomaniacs like @rogerkver will never do Steem any good. They are not interested in telling others about this chain.
👍  , ,
👎  , ,
properties (23)
post_id81,864,924
authorenforcer48
permlinkre-steevc-q1805s
categorystee
json_metadata{"tags":["stee"],"app":"steempeak\/2.1.1"}
created2019-11-19 14:27:30
last_update2019-11-19 14:28:15
depth3
children2
net_rshares279,512,852,871
last_payout2019-11-26 14:27:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.023 SBD
curator_payout_value0.023 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length791
author_reputation72,258,491,181,307
root_title"Steem gets more coverage "
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (6)
@steevc ·
I agree. We need the pioneers with a following elsewhere. If some big Youtuber says they are only going to post on DTube or 3Speak then they can migrate a lot of followers who will then discover other content here. I am about to write a post on this topic. Just sharpening my quill.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id81,872,253
authorsteevc
permlinkre-enforcer48-q18f97
categorystee
json_metadata{"tags":["stee"],"app":"steempeak\/2.1.1"}
created2019-11-19 19:53:33
last_update2019-11-19 19:53:33
depth4
children0
net_rshares14,574,015,292
last_payout2019-11-26 19:53:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length282
author_reputation273,317,013,544,223
root_title"Steem gets more coverage "
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@freebornangel ·
Take it easy on Roger.
He took enough freedom that his got taken.
Being unafraid to be free is the greatest virtue in a slave world.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id81,879,522
authorfreebornangel
permlinkq18y0z
categorystee
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-11-20 02:39:03
last_update2019-11-20 02:39:03
depth4
children0
net_rshares14,559,808,273
last_payout2019-11-27 02:39:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length132
author_reputation217,103,420,888,695
root_title"Steem gets more coverage "
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)