RE: The first payout is in aaaaaaand 94 percent was lost by ocrdu

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @oaldamster/the-first-payout-is-in-aaaaaaand-94-percent-was-lost

· @ocrdu · (edited)
Sounds about par for the course, 1/20 to 1/25 of what it could have been paid out, I have similar payouts.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id2,344,229
authorocrdu
permlinkre-oaldamster-the-first-payout-is-in-aaaaaaand-94-percent-was-lost-20170406t111730196z
categorysteememe
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steememe"]}"
created2017-04-06 11:17:30
last_update2017-04-06 12:41:36
depth1
children9
net_rshares59,093,912,649
last_payout2017-04-13 11:17:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length106
author_reputation140,892,828,816,537
root_title"The first payout is in aaaaaaand 94 percent was lost"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@oaldamster ·
The last pre hardfork posts would end somewhere at that payout level.
Looks like a developement booboo to me.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id2,344,259
authoroaldamster
permlinkre-ocrdu-re-oaldamster-the-first-payout-is-in-aaaaaaand-94-percent-was-lost-20170406t112447597z
categorysteememe
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steememe"]}"
created2017-04-06 11:24:48
last_update2017-04-06 11:24:48
depth2
children6
net_rshares36,229,424,381
last_payout2017-04-13 11:24:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length109
author_reputation69,006,323,355,244
root_title"The first payout is in aaaaaaand 94 percent was lost"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@ocrdu ·
I suspect the first post-fork posts won't do much better.

And yes, it was a design choice, allowing back-end demands making their way into the user domain, which could and should have been avoided.

The "claim rewards" button is similar in this, it doesn't appear to have any use for us users but it still made its way into the user interface because it was easier for the back-end people. Less disturbing than the rewards fuck-up, though.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id2,344,302
authorocrdu
permlinkre-oaldamster-re-ocrdu-re-oaldamster-the-first-payout-is-in-aaaaaaand-94-percent-was-lost-20170406t113311968z
categorysteememe
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steememe"]}"
created2017-04-06 11:33:12
last_update2017-04-06 11:33:12
depth3
children5
net_rshares57,780,714,590
last_payout2017-04-13 11:33:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length440
author_reputation140,892,828,816,537
root_title"The first payout is in aaaaaaand 94 percent was lost"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@oaldamster ·
There must be some other use for the "claim rewards' button. Like accepting the shared rewards for a post. But I do miss a "decline rewards" to accompany that one. Or 'burn Steem', to support deflation.

The post hardfork of 1718 post payout rewards will take about 5 weeks to be fully up Steem, I think. They'll improve by the week. 

The pre hardfork of 1718 posts should have stayed on the old reward pool payout system. And I agree that this probably could/ should have been avoided. But we're only human and we make mistakes, yet it is also good to admit when it does.

Ah well, I guess we took one for the team...

Aaaaaand moving on!
👍  
properties (23)
post_id2,344,357
authoroaldamster
permlinkre-ocrdu-re-oaldamster-re-ocrdu-re-oaldamster-the-first-payout-is-in-aaaaaaand-94-percent-was-lost-20170406t114538047z
categorysteememe
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steememe"]}"
created2017-04-06 11:45:39
last_update2017-04-06 11:45:39
depth4
children4
net_rshares4,529,104,501
last_payout2017-04-13 11:45:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length640
author_reputation69,006,323,355,244
root_title"The first payout is in aaaaaaand 94 percent was lost"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@meesterboom ·
Yeah that's a good yard stick mine have been about a twentieth of what they were
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,344,511
authormeesterboom
permlinkre-ocrdu-re-oaldamster-the-first-payout-is-in-aaaaaaand-94-percent-was-lost-20170406t123222240z
categorysteememe
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steememe"]}"
created2017-04-06 12:32:21
last_update2017-04-06 12:32:21
depth2
children1
net_rshares58,370,224,914
last_payout2017-04-13 12:32:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length80
author_reputation823,295,147,248,484
root_title"The first payout is in aaaaaaand 94 percent was lost"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@oaldamster ·
Guess we can call that our community consensus then.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id2,344,588
authoroaldamster
permlinkre-meesterboom-re-ocrdu-re-oaldamster-the-first-payout-is-in-aaaaaaand-94-percent-was-lost-20170406t125252608z
categorysteememe
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steememe"]}"
created2017-04-06 12:52:54
last_update2017-04-06 12:52:54
depth3
children0
net_rshares31,703,731,509
last_payout2017-04-13 12:52:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length52
author_reputation69,006,323,355,244
root_title"The first payout is in aaaaaaand 94 percent was lost"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)