Few things in clarification/response to the comments about me. First off, I appreciate being called clever, of course. ;) But I would like to address the hostility I seem to detect towards me. Oh and, I am a dude, not a she.

In regards to:
>(got [him] a couple flags not sure why)

A few people follow me around and flag anything I do, because they don't like steemcleaners. No big deal.

When you say 
> Last summer [he] used [his] might to destroy an author because she didn’t like his posts.

I am not quite sure what you are referring to because I do not believe I have ever "destroyed an author", or at least, an actual author. I do target plagiarists, identity thieves, and fraudsters. So yes, if you are referring to a plagiarist I downvoted to oblivion, it's because I don't like plagiarism posts.

>[he] bragged on other social networks

Also not sure what this is about or referring to? I was anonymous on steemit until Steemfest, so no one knew me on other social media sites anyways (and still don't, as very few people know my last name). I am also not sure what 'stir in the community' you are talking about, do you have a source?

---

Anyways, in regards to my voting bot: one of the express things I do is target undervalued posts that appear to be good quality. This is an interesting decision to curation because it means high risk - high reward. Essentially, I gamble on a post: giving the author a reward no matter what, and sometimes these posts go trending and I get a good curation reward. I actually AVOID targeting most authors whom always recieve good rewards, because of the 'race to the bottom' effect of bot voters. Due to avoiding the same big name authors, and finding undervalued posts, I am actually one of the largest voters towards 'unique authors' each day.