RE: Why Inequality on Steemit is a Good Thing! by doctorstrange

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @pachenko/re-doctorstrange-re-pachenko-why-inequality-on-steemit-is-a-good-thing-20160729t032524736z

· @doctorstrange ·
I don't have a problem with fluff pieces at this stage, it's just that people should not call their brothers-in-arms names for doing things that need to be done in the best interest of the site, such as call out people that are copying and pasting, or catfishing. The site can do perfectly well without condoning those activities.

The foundation for the future is being set now. It's a rather libertarian crypto base at the moment, which is fine and reasonable, but people are incentivized by what the whales promote. We can promote best practices and still get to where we want to be. There is more than enough good content here without having to turn a blind eye to fraud. 

Anyway, we are on the same page. Let's find some other people we can disagree with instead! Just kidding!!

Cheers
properties (22)
post_id328,590
authordoctorstrange
permlinkre-pachenko-re-doctorstrange-re-pachenko-why-inequality-on-steemit-is-a-good-thing-20160729t053714283z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2016-07-29 05:37:27
last_update2016-07-29 05:37:27
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2016-08-28 05:02:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length792
author_reputation1,427,067,266,054
root_title"Why Inequality on Steemit is a Good Thing!"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000