RE: A brief note on community building and the role of government interference. by ripplerm

Viewing a response to: @picokernel/a-brief-note-on-community-building-and-the-role-of-government-interference

steemit · @ripplerm · Feb 27 '17 (edited)

$5.63

> If a flag is rejected by the community, the flagger has potential to lose money.  

unless we also applying the following rule:
> if an upvote is rejected by the community, the up-voter has potential to lose something  

else we will end up as a community where everybody tends to say yes to everything, and nobody dare to stand out saying no.

👍 abit, abcd, escrow

`post_id`	2,054,046
`author`	ripplerm
`permlink`	re-picokernel-a-brief-note-on-community-building-and-the-role-of-government-interference-20170227t184623076z
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
`created`	2017-02-27 18:46:21
`last_update`	2017-02-27 18:47:42
`depth`	1
`children`	3
`net_rshares`	29,244,451,446,059
`last_payout`	2017-03-30 19:47:39
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	4.222 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	1.407 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	345
`author_reputation`	12,915,496,650,148
`root_title`	"A brief note on community building and the role of government interference."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (3)

voter	rshares	pct
abit	29,240,024,978,577	100%
abcd	3,853,982,916	100%
escrow	572,484,566	100%

@abit · Feb 27 '17

Good point.

properties (22)

`post_id`	2,054,462
`author`	abit
`permlink`	re-ripplerm-re-picokernel-a-brief-note-on-community-building-and-the-role-of-government-interference-20170227t195502811z
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
`created`	2017-02-27 19:55:45
`last_update`	2017-02-27 19:55:45
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`net_rshares`	0
`last_payout`	2017-03-30 19:47:39
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	11
`author_reputation`	111,629,191,115,088
`root_title`	"A brief note on community building and the role of government interference."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000

@picokernel · Feb 27 '17

$5.86

This is not my personal opinion on how to solve the issue. I was simply giving you an incentive model, an example. I didn't mean that that was my solution. I was just trying to illustrate my point further, sorry for any confusion.

👍 abit, ripplerm, abcd, escrow

`post_id`	2,054,548
`author`	picokernel
`permlink`	re-ripplerm-re-picokernel-a-brief-note-on-community-building-and-the-role-of-government-interference-20170227t200743220z
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
`created`	2017-02-27 20:07:42
`last_update`	2017-02-27 20:07:42
`depth`	2
`children`	1
`net_rshares`	29,882,299,955,039
`last_payout`	2017-03-30 19:47:39
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	4.397 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	1.465 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	230
`author_reputation`	17,511,902,611,404
`root_title`	"A brief note on community building and the role of government interference."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (4)

voter	rshares	pct
abit	29,863,266,941,181	100%
abcd	3,853,982,916	100%
escrow	572,484,566	100%
ripplerm	14,606,546,376	100%

@ripplerm · Feb 28 '17

nice clarification.

btw, the current curation scheme is actually biased towards up-vote IMO. (up-voters always has potential to earn something, while down-voters has zero potential earning while still losing his votes power)

if we were to make the game fairer, we should also reward the down-voters if a post end-up in a negative value in total-accumulated-votes.

but, to do this, we had to first decouple the curation reward from post-reward, 
as suggested here: https://steemit.com/steemit/@ripplerm/proposal-decoupling-curation-rewards-from-post-s

properties (22)

`post_id`	2,056,941
`author`	ripplerm
`permlink`	re-picokernel-re-ripplerm-re-picokernel-a-brief-note-on-community-building-and-the-role-of-government-interference-20170228t045818939z
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "links": ["https://steemit.com/steemit/@ripplerm/proposal-decoupling-curation-rewards-from-post-s"], "tags": ["steemit"]}"
`created`	2017-02-28 04:58:18
`last_update`	2017-02-28 04:58:18
`depth`	3
`children`	0
`net_rshares`	0
`last_payout`	2017-03-30 19:47:39
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	553
`author_reputation`	12,915,496,650,148
`root_title`	"A brief note on community building and the role of government interference."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000