RE: Confusing information from Steemworld and FrontEnds // by steemchiller

Viewing a response to: @lordbutterfly/confusing-information-from-steemworld-and-frontends

steempeak · @steemchiller · Sep 8 '19 (edited)

$1.45

As I said, the `weight` in the `active_votes` array for your votes is being returned as `0` from the nodes. Without weight there are no curation rewards. Did you receive any rewards for one of those votes? If not, it's a bug in steemd or your vote has been broadcast multiple times, which I think could lead to no curation rewards too. Did you use an autovoter?

Since the HF, the exact vote amount can no longer be predicted exactly, because it depends on the payout amount of the post you are voting. I added a 'Sim. Payout' button on SteemWorld, so that we can see how much our vote is worth for a given payout. That feature is still being tested and the result may not be 100% accurate, but it already shows roughly how it works.

👍 double-u, steembasicincome, chriddi, lordbutterfly, ibc, eonwarped, condeas, luegenbaron, isarmoewe, fw206, muelli, muscara, phoneinf, linuxbot, gerdtrudroepke, anli, ezravandi, holycow2019, i-c-e, re2pair

`post_id`	79,816,084
`author`	steemchiller
`permlink`	pxid33
`category`	steempeak
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steempeak"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
`created`	2019-09-08 10:28:15
`last_update`	2019-09-08 10:33:45
`depth`	1
`children`	10
`net_rshares`	4,776,453,679,696
`last_payout`	2019-09-15 10:28:15
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.726 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.721 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	733
`author_reputation`	278,968,749,422,913
`root_title`	"Confusing information from Steemworld and FrontEnds //"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (20)

voter	rshares	pct
double-u	2,171,070,089,613	100%
isarmoewe	40,772,386,788	100%
eonwarped	103,966,831,006	9%
anli	4,416,944,896	99%
steembasicincome	1,454,921,611,106	98.17%
chriddi	309,882,908,471	50%
condeas	73,855,267,305	40%
phoneinf	15,417,834,668	100%
ezravandi	3,797,790,475	1.02%
lordbutterfly	249,092,036,708	100%
luegenbaron	44,651,413,860	100%
fw206	28,012,600,679	100%
muelli	25,003,797,164	50%
gerdtrudroepke	13,449,437,321	50%
muscara	22,300,154,545	50%
ibc	201,272,445,740	80%
linuxbot	13,845,796,643	80%
i-c-e	128,214,265	4%
holycow2019	586,674,426	100%
re2pair	9,444,017	100%

@lordbutterfly · Sep 8 '19

$0.02

As you can see i got curation 2 times out of 7 in the screenshot. A week ago i got 0/10. 

Im using autovoter on most stuff but it seems the problem, in 90% of the time is tied into @vikisecrets posts. 
Is there any way i can find out how to remedy this problem? 

Hmm. So what is the 0.07$ vote value at 100% showing exactly? How does that compare with Steempeak and its vote slider?

👍 steemchiller

`post_id`	79,816,453
`author`	lordbutterfly
`permlink`	re-steemchiller-pxie2g
`category`	steempeak
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steempeak"],"app":"steempeak\/1.15.5"}
`created`	2019-09-08 10:49:27
`last_update`	2019-09-08 10:49:27
`depth`	2
`children`	8
`net_rshares`	97,934,190,496
`last_payout`	2019-09-15 10:49:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.010 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.010 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	385
`author_reputation`	104,712,854,805,089
`root_title`	"Confusing information from Steemworld and FrontEnds //"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
steemchiller	0 B		97,934,190,496	25%

@steemchiller · Sep 8 '19 (edited)

$1.32

>As you can see i got curation 2 times out of 7 in the screenshot. A week ago i got 0/10.

Those are the predicted (coming) rewards, but it would be interesting to see, if you really received a `Curation Reward` operation after payout (in Account Operations). I'm not sure, if the reason could be that not all nodes are running the fixed version 0.22.1 yet. I will wait till all nodes run the current version and report the issue on GitHub, if it's not fixed then.

>So what is the 0.07$ vote value at 100% showing exactly?

It shows that as long as the simulated payout is set to `0`, your 100% vote on a post that got no other votes yet (comment for example) is worth ~ $0.07. But keep in mind that (in reality) you always vote the same amount of `rshares` and your vote's value will go up when other voters vote the same post.

👍 double-u, steembasicincome, chriddi, lordbutterfly, ibc, condeas, luegenbaron, isarmoewe, fw206, practicalthought, muscara, linuxbot, gerdtrudroepke, anli, ezravandi, holycow2019, i-c-e

`post_id`	79,816,949
`author`	steemchiller
`permlink`	pxifi0
`category`	steempeak
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steempeak"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
`created`	2019-09-08 11:20:27
`last_update`	2019-09-08 11:25:33
`depth`	3
`children`	7
`net_rshares`	4,419,604,336,854
`last_payout`	2019-09-15 11:20:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.662 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.659 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	829
`author_reputation`	278,968,749,422,913
`root_title`	"Confusing information from Steemworld and FrontEnds //"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (17)

voter	rshares	pct
double-u	2,127,665,022,751	100%
isarmoewe	41,603,165,701	100%
anli	3,947,126,896	99%
steembasicincome	1,293,288,407,726	97.36%
chriddi	286,478,906,873	50%
condeas	74,025,631,455	40%
ezravandi	3,803,905,529	1.02%
lordbutterfly	247,078,517,816	100%
practicalthought	23,597,711,254	100%
luegenbaron	43,777,527,430	100%
fw206	28,584,825,192	100%
gerdtrudroepke	13,440,970,941	50%
muscara	22,092,890,570	50%
ibc	195,746,672,039	80%
linuxbot	13,768,442,806	80%
i-c-e	126,041,784	4%
holycow2019	578,570,091	100%

@practicalthought · Sep 8 '19 (edited)

$0.07

Wanted to add this so you have more data to work with. On 09/04 and again on 09/05 I voted on posts by @theouterlight. It was right after the 5 minute mark and the amount of curation was very small both times. The posts grew to curation of 30.45 and 41.60 respectively, yet shows 0 pending curation rewards for me. Yesterday I voted in at 6 minutes and that post is showing curation. All other posts I vote on that falls right after that 5 minute bar shows rewards, but I'm still not ruling out a possible glitch in the blockchain timer for some accounts. Hoping though it is some sort of communication glitch from the blockchain to your program though as they should have given me my largest curation rewards of the month, lol.

edited to add that the weight for both votes was 100% as shown as well on SteemWorld.

👍 steemchiller

`post_id`	79,817,200
`author`	practicalthought
`permlink`	pxig2o
`category`	steempeak
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steempeak"],"users":["theouterlight"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
`created`	2019-09-08 11:32:48
`last_update`	2019-09-08 11:34:45
`depth`	4
`children`	5
`net_rshares`	294,164,168,482
`last_payout`	2019-09-15 11:32:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.033 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.033 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	815
`author_reputation`	33,113,112,148,259
`root_title`	"Confusing information from Steemworld and FrontEnds //"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
steemchiller	0 B		294,164,168,482	75%

5 replies

@lordbutterfly · Sep 8 '19 (edited)

Just checked the account operations. I got curation 1 time out of 13 votes to Vikisecrets in last 7 days. 
There seems to be an issue here. 

@gtg any chance you could take a look at this. Would be greatly appreciated.

properties (22)

`post_id`	79,818,644
`author`	lordbutterfly
`permlink`	re-steemchiller-pxiizd
`category`	steempeak
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steempeak"],"app":"steempeak\/1.15.5"}
`created`	2019-09-08 12:35:36
`last_update`	2019-09-08 12:36:39
`depth`	4
`children`	0
`net_rshares`	0
`last_payout`	2019-09-15 12:35:36
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	219
`author_reputation`	104,712,854,805,089
`root_title`	"Confusing information from Steemworld and FrontEnds //"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000

@eonwarped · Sep 10 '19

$0.04

Oh... I just realized this comment covers the case that a vote was rebroadcasted leading to removing curation. I believe this is what happened, and I confirmed one of the cases for this.

👍 steemchiller, evanvanness

`post_id`	79,895,636
`author`	eonwarped
`permlink`	pxn0q9
`category`	steempeak
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steempeak"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
`created`	2019-09-10 22:49:21
`last_update`	2019-09-10 22:49:21
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`net_rshares`	194,165,828,389
`last_payout`	2019-09-17 22:49:21
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.021 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.021 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	186
`author_reputation`	61,975,811,524,573
`root_title`	"Confusing information from Steemworld and FrontEnds //"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
steemchiller	0 B		193,182,666,338	50%
evanvanness	0 B		983,162,051	100%