RE: Why whales are needed - and a proposal to insure the massive success of steemit, ie Subtractive Upvoting Gradient by jl777

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @tuck-fheman/re-jl777-why-whales-are-needed-and-a-proposal-to-insure-the-massive-success-of-steemit-20160723t163132749z

· @jl777 ·
$0.05
If it isnt an issue in reality, then what is the downside for doing it? It will have tremendous positive PR effects.
Also whales are not prevented from upvoting anyone, the system would just reduce the power. This is already being done based on how many minutes from the initial post, how many others have upvoted, so its not like we are not already tweaking the voting power

There is a real issue of envy. Maybe as a whale you prefer not to see this, but yet it is there. Ask the people who started and then stopped posting on steemit. I imagine the majority will say the unfair payouts. [Yes, I know steemit still pays out more than any other blogging site, but people are strange sometimes]

So, if steemit can say that the entire system is biased so the upvoting flows downstream, this will go a long way toward reducing the envy factor
👍  , , ,
properties (23)
post_id217,664
authorjl777
permlinkre-tuck-fheman-re-jl777-why-whales-are-needed-and-a-proposal-to-insure-the-massive-success-of-steemit-20160723t163919065z
categoryupvoting
json_metadata"{"tags": ["upvoting"]}"
created2016-07-23 16:39:18
last_update2016-07-23 16:39:18
depth2
children0
net_rshares45,859,519,655
last_payout2016-08-25 12:00:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.050 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length841
author_reputation14,981,508,863,374
root_title"Why whales are needed - and a proposal to insure the massive success of steemit, ie Subtractive Upvoting Gradient"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)