In my own personal experience "psychiatry" has been only harmful. This doesn't mean psychiatry does not help the people whom it is helping but I cannot speak about it helping me in a positive way so I don't choose to discuss the topic of psychiatry.  

I know psychiatry promotes "behavioral normalization" but it also relies on labels, passes stigmas to people, and creates psychological and financial harm by those stigmas.

Rather than be critical of psychiatry when I know there are people who dedicate their lives to helping people using the tool of psychiatry I prefer to take on a more constructive and respectful tone toward well meaning psychiatrists. Political psychiatry I don't particularly like.

Governments, psychiatrists, these are people who work for society to promote the norms of the society they work for. When you say people want to change the baseline of what normal behavior is then you are talking about radicals, reformists, activists, revolutionaries, avant garde.  To change cultural trends is the role of thought leaders and culture jammers. Like with journalism the social risks are extremely high and there may even be direct physical consequences as people don't always appreciate or understand.

I'll leave the "change the culture" articles to people who are focused on that. My posts are mostly about surviving the culture and being resilient. Survive whatever it is and whatever the environment brings. Changing the environment often requires high risks, sacrifices, and warfare, which can decrease the ability to survive by creating a very toxic environment until the conflict ends.