As I said, the `weight` in the `active_votes` array for your votes is being returned as `0` from the nodes. Without weight there are no curation rewards. Did you receive any rewards for one of those votes? If not, it's a bug in steemd or your vote has been broadcast multiple times, which I think could lead to no curation rewards too. Did you use an autovoter?

Since the HF, the exact vote amount can no longer be predicted exactly, because it depends on the payout amount of the post you are voting. I added a 'Sim. Payout' button on SteemWorld, so that we can see how much our vote is worth for a given payout. That feature is still being tested and the result may not be 100% accurate, but it already shows roughly how it works.

Looks like things are getting complicated and I'm just voting around without thinking about these details.

It's much nicer that way.

Upvoted for visibility as you are the second person to talk about these issues, and I don't know how to research the issue.

I'm going to tag @eonwarped because he understands the curation calculations and also has worked extensively with the condenser front-ends which may be just the combination of knowledge to explain this.

#### Hi @lordbutterfly!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your **UA** account score is currently 3.915 which ranks you at **#4436** across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 139 contributions, your post is ranked at **#59**.
##### Evaluation of your UA score:

* You're on the right track, try to gather more followers.
* The readers like your work!
* Try to work on user engagement: the more people that interact with you via the comments, the higher your UA score!


**Feel free to join our [@steem-ua Discord server](https://discord.gg/KpBNYGz)**

I inspected what happened in one case, where I saw that a vote was cast at 50% and shortly after changed to 100%. When I checked the code, this scenario zeros out the vote weight, and means that curation rewards for the voter are zeroed out. 

I thought that it would make it as if you voted later but it turns out that it actually just zeros it. Wondering if this is something that will be changed in the future, since at least to me it is not what I would expect.

I'm not sure if all your cases are like that or not. By the way, if you do not recall these revote actions, I would recommend checking if autovoters are interfering with things.

It's indeed very confusing @lordbutterfly

Thx for sharing

I wrote about the confusion surrounding calculating upvote values *before* upvoting - [here](https://steemit.com/steem/@rycharde/why-do-steemworld-and-steemnow-show-different-values-for-my-upvote). Also explained by @steemchiller, I see, in comments.

Essentially, every platform now needs to make an *estimate* and many just choose to use *different estimates*.

As @steemchiller also noted, the vote weights are no longer broadcast, so that any platform needs to simulate the full reward curve formula as each vote takes place. This is also no guarantee as steem uses a number of approximations to handle the huge rshares numbers.

Anyway, hope some of this helps.