RE: A better approach to Turing Complete Smart Contracts by stellabelle

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @dantheman/a-better-approach-to-turing-complete-smart-contracts

· @stellabelle · (edited)
$0.17
Glad to see you posting an update. The coming changes are indeed good, however, they don't address the main reason users are fleeing: centralization of power and the feeling that their voices don't in fact matter. Is there any roadmap as far as fixing the problems with centralization of power?
Also, more updates, even in a smaller, "nuggetized" fashion would be highly recommended. Even if it was just to give users a generic update like "I'm swamped!" People go nuts when they don't hear from you, me included.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
post_id1,261,579
authorstellabelle
permlinkre-dantheman-a-better-approach-to-turing-complete-smart-contracts-20161028t203035656z
categoryblockchain
json_metadata"{"tags": ["blockchain"]}"
created2016-10-28 20:30:36
last_update2016-10-28 20:32:30
depth1
children3
net_rshares2,474,423,225,245
last_payout2016-11-28 22:34:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.163 SBD
curator_payout_value0.003 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length513
author_reputation436,515,832,240,166
root_title"A better approach to Turing Complete Smart Contracts"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@dantheman ·
I just posted an update via @steemitblog that addresses some of those issues.  I spend a lot of time thinking about robust long-term solutions to decentralize power while maintaining order.
👍  , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id1,261,620
authordantheman
permlinkre-stellabelle-re-dantheman-a-better-approach-to-turing-complete-smart-contracts-20161028t203732304z
categoryblockchain
json_metadata"{"users": ["steemitblog"], "tags": ["blockchain"]}"
created2016-10-28 20:37:18
last_update2016-10-28 20:37:18
depth2
children2
net_rshares48,618,255,689
last_payout2016-11-28 22:34:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length189
author_reputation240,497,801,758,545
root_title"A better approach to Turing Complete Smart Contracts"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@stellabelle ·
ok, thanks. I'll check that out now.
properties (22)
post_id1,261,665
authorstellabelle
permlinkre-dantheman-re-stellabelle-re-dantheman-a-better-approach-to-turing-complete-smart-contracts-20161028t204633876z
categoryblockchain
json_metadata"{"tags": ["blockchain"]}"
created2016-10-28 20:46:33
last_update2016-10-28 20:46:33
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2016-11-28 22:34:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length36
author_reputation436,515,832,240,166
root_title"A better approach to Turing Complete Smart Contracts"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@knircky ·
I disagree with stellabelle and many others that whale power is a problem. It is also what makes steem work and work differently from kyher platforms. The dilution is a solution to this.
properties (22)
post_id1,263,735
authorknircky
permlinkre-dantheman-re-stellabelle-re-dantheman-a-better-approach-to-turing-complete-smart-contracts-20161029t080516476z
categoryblockchain
json_metadata"{"tags": ["blockchain"]}"
created2016-10-29 08:05:18
last_update2016-10-29 08:05:18
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2016-11-28 22:34:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length186
author_reputation217,103,420,888,695
root_title"A better approach to Turing Complete Smart Contracts"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000