Rule by force is the elephant in this room, eliminate that and I think we are all in agreement, ahng and I that sharing is better, and crapitalusts that think skinning their neighbors makes perfect sense.

Thanks for the nice reply
I have two questions left. And you could say read some books.
But I thing direct communication is more effective for a fast exchange of knowledge.
//Trading is not capitalism.//
So if I trade with another person that is a private matter without any form of third party coercion , and I could see that as market socialism or mutualism or is there a third party involved just like now with " the government" only different?
Is the trading in those systems, strictly without a medium of exchange, or with, or maybe both?

edit; I'll read into the market socialism and mutualism systems, you answer would be welcome though.

I'll put it here there was a warning about; six posts deep.

I have to say I am stunned. You are taking the NAP and fit the philosophy in the country realm, you can only apply the NAP to individuals.
North Korea has nothing to do with anarchist capitalism.
The people there are ruled by a dictator. And even if they say to be a democracy.
A democracy is also rule by force. I'm almost 100% sure that non of the people living the have ever heard about the NAP and that those people are suffering there.
The NAP does not apply to country's (which are concepts) It does only apply to an individual and in the moment.
It's as easy as saying if someone is attacking you you may defend yourself or others that are attacked. And it's a principle not a law or a document anyone can sign or agree to. A document has no added value its would be just a piece of paper with ink, just like a constitution or law, etc.

I hope my explanation helped a bit and I did get across why it does not apply to any "country".