Censorship... do barriers constitute Censorship? by dwinblood

View this thread on steempeak.com
· @dwinblood ·
$12.01
Censorship... do barriers constitute Censorship?
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/nP10eCK.png"/>
It can come in the form of reducing payouts so it is no longer feasible for an author to put as much effort into a post, article, etc.   It can come in the form of making it so information can only be seen by putting in a proper request, or going to a specific location or room.     These things are true of everything, not just steemit.

A common argument on steemit that I myself have made is that steemit is censorship free because it is on the block chain.

Lately I have come to realize that this is functionally no different to someone saying "*It is not censored, you can put in a FOIA request and get access*".     

We know that is slow, and likely heavily redacted.

The problem with saying it is on the block chain is that you have suddenly limited access to those technically inclined or willing to learn how to view the block chain in the raw.   That is a very limited and small audience.

That could be much like me attacking the redacted parts of documents as censorship with:
"*You could run for public office, get elected, and then get access...*"
"*You could join the FBI and work hard and eventually get access...*"

Those things obviously are far more extreme than viewing the block chain.   Yet in reality that could be used to attempt to argue that that information is not censored either.

My recent thought is the idea that BARRIERS that a person must overcome in order to view information from a perception (*in other words subjectively*) be viewed as censorship.    Is it technically censorship?   **NO**.

Will that stop very vocal people from posting about censorship based upon their perceptions?  **NO**.

I've also noted that negative news tends to spread like wild fire.   Positive news not as much.    I said in a comment earlier that you can do ten positive things, and a single negative thing and it is very often that negative thing which people talk about.

<h1>Steemit</h1>
The <a href="https://steemit.com/steemit/@steemitblog/steemit-2017-roadmap">roadmap for steemit that was posted earlier today</a> had some cool ideas about people being able to moderate their posts, communal groups, etc and determine what they want visible.    It is noted correctly that the information will still be on the block chain.

I do think this is a great idea.

An idea I had when commenting was the idea of having some very subtle icon like an eyeball or something that appears somewhere near the top of the post IF that post has hidden content.    Then the person could choose to click that eyeball to view that content, though the default view would always be as the moderator intended.

I proposed this because the statement that you can go view it on the block chain is likely going to be a barrier to most of the masses.    You are expecting them to go and learn how to do that, use an external tool or site, etc.    The likely result would instead by negative PR from the people that are uncomfortable or just mentally not capable of doing that.     We are wanting to grow huge and attract as many people as possible.

I believe in the interest of this having some very unobtrusive way for people to view the block chain ONSITE of a post would be desirable.   There would be no real barriers or hoops to jump through.   If the icon appears there is hidden content.   If the person truly wants to see what was hidden they click the icon.   DONE.

I had one person comment essentially that people should be able to moderate their posts.   I don't disagree.   Yet, I also believe in the censorship free aspect of steem/steemit.   I do not believe we need to act elite and assume that the masses will have our skills, or the ability/desire to learn how to go cruise through the block chain.    It is far more likely they will simply get vocal about it.    In fact, I can say it WILL happen.   No doubt about it.

Now even if we were to add an icon you still would have people complain.   That is unavoidable.    Some people simply like to complain.    

We should however attempt to build an inclusive platform, not a platform where we force our views and opinions upon how people will use it or want to use it upon everyone.

With this said... I really like the idea of moderating comments, and posts.   I simply believe we should make it easy for ANYONE to see what was hidden if they choose, rather than expecting them to jump through hoops.
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/ZeuP2Ee.png"/>
***Steem On!***
 <center>
<a href="https://steemit.com/steemit/@elyaque/free-steemit-badges-overview"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/e5FQyyM.png"/></a>
<a href="http://steemverify.com/"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/m1rDTas.png"/></a>
</center>
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 101 others
properties (23)
post_id1,777,822
authordwinblood
permlinkcensorship-do-barriers-constitute-censorship
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "format": "markdown", "links": ["https://steemit.com/steemit/@steemitblog/steemit-2017-roadmap", "https://steemit.com/steemit/@elyaque/free-steemit-badges-overview", "http://steemverify.com/"], "image": ["http://i.imgur.com/nP10eCK.png"], "tags": ["steemit", "steem", "philosophy", "censorship", "perception"]}"
created2017-01-17 19:36:12
last_update2017-01-17 19:36:12
depth0
children14
net_rshares40,333,456,614,628
last_payout2017-02-17 21:22:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value10.237 SBD
curator_payout_value1.769 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length4,700
author_reputation223,300,085,257,919
root_title"Censorship... do barriers constitute Censorship?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (165)
@dantheman ·
$0.10
My personal opinion is that Steemit should make it easy to see what was censored and to show all content people *want to see*.  The only content that steemit should force people to go to the blockchain for is content that the authorities force us to take down at gun point.

Fortunately, that content will still be readily available by a quick link to a dozen other websites displaying the same content but from a different jurisdiction.
👍  , , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id1,778,483
authordantheman
permlinkre-dwinblood-censorship-do-barriers-constitute-censorship-20170117t210833564z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-01-17 21:08:33
last_update2017-01-17 21:08:33
depth1
children2
net_rshares2,409,050,532,507
last_payout2017-02-17 21:22:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.077 SBD
curator_payout_value0.025 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length437
author_reputation240,497,801,758,545
root_title"Censorship... do barriers constitute Censorship?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (6)
@dwinblood ·
$0.08
I agree. :)   This is basically what I was getting at.   As usual you cut to the chase and said it more quickly and to the point.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id1,778,800
authordwinblood
permlinkre-dantheman-re-dwinblood-censorship-do-barriers-constitute-censorship-20170117t215009403z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-01-17 21:50:06
last_update2017-01-17 21:50:06
depth2
children0
net_rshares2,008,115,866,666
last_payout2017-02-17 21:22:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.059 SBD
curator_payout_value0.020 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length129
author_reputation223,300,085,257,919
root_title"Censorship... do barriers constitute Censorship?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@liondani ·
Very well said! So excited!
properties (22)
post_id1,779,883
authorliondani
permlinkre-dantheman-re-dwinblood-censorship-do-barriers-constitute-censorship-20170118t004854637z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-01-18 00:48:54
last_update2017-01-18 00:48:54
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-02-17 21:22:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length27
author_reputation91,903,771,336,326
root_title"Censorship... do barriers constitute Censorship?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@sigmajin ·
Personally, i think the idea of someone being able to moderate their posts is a pretty bad idea.   Artificial consensus is twice the sin of disagreement.
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id1,779,675
authorsigmajin
permlinkre-dwinblood-censorship-do-barriers-constitute-censorship-20170117t230914770z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-01-18 00:09:12
last_update2017-01-18 00:09:12
depth1
children5
net_rshares96,439,198,457
last_payout2017-02-17 21:22:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length153
author_reputation35,846,309,024,528
root_title"Censorship... do barriers constitute Censorship?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@dwinblood ·
I don't care if they can moderate it if I have something telling me that stuff is being hidden and makes it easy for my to UNHIDE it.    I am not a fan of other people telling me what I can and cannot see, or what I should or should not like.   This means overall I don't like moderation either.    Yet, if I have a way to quickly see what they chose to conceal from me, I won't care.
properties (22)
post_id1,779,712
authordwinblood
permlinkre-sigmajin-re-dwinblood-censorship-do-barriers-constitute-censorship-20170118t001516158z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-01-18 00:15:12
last_update2017-01-18 00:15:12
depth2
children4
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-02-17 21:22:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length384
author_reputation223,300,085,257,919
root_title"Censorship... do barriers constitute Censorship?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@sigmajin · (edited)
Posts that ive seen with hidden comments have them listed at the very bottom, making them pretty easy to miss for most people on long posts.  

I guess what i have to wonder is why should we allow someone to control the replies _that other people see_ to their posts.

Like my post about the  flags, and the reasons i thought you were  wrong -- wouldnt it have been kind of shitty if i could have just completely hidden your rebuttals (not that id do something like that, but as an example).  And yeah, people could click on the greyed out thingy to see what you said.  But some people. maybe even most people wont.  The whole purpose of the greying out/putting it at the bottom, is to make it less visible.

Just as an example, a couple weeks ago, i noticed a top-of-trending post that was completely plagarized.  I wrote a comment, a couple whales noticed and the post ended up losing most of its reward.

Would it have if the poster had the power to hide critical comments?

But even beyond downvoting, the ability to hide dissenting comments takes away the incentive to rebut them.  It detracts from engagement and debate.
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id1,779,775
authorsigmajin
permlinkre-dwinblood-re-sigmajin-re-dwinblood-censorship-do-barriers-constitute-censorship-20170117t232617988z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-01-18 00:26:15
last_update2017-01-18 00:28:54
depth3
children3
net_rshares96,439,198,457
last_payout2017-02-17 21:22:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,126
author_reputation35,846,309,024,528
root_title"Censorship... do barriers constitute Censorship?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@liondani ·
# Can not agree more !!!
properties (22)
post_id1,779,879
authorliondani
permlinkre-dwinblood-censorship-do-barriers-constitute-censorship-20170118t004744520z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-01-18 00:47:45
last_update2017-01-18 00:47:45
depth1
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-02-17 21:22:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length24
author_reputation91,903,771,336,326
root_title"Censorship... do barriers constitute Censorship?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@sneak ·
Free speech includes the freedom to decide what one publishes on their own website or not.

You are evaluating this in the context of present day, where there is only one good option for interacting with the Steem Blockchain community, and that is steemit.com.  If that doesn't change, we haven't done our job.
properties (22)
post_id1,790,405
authorsneak
permlinkre-dwinblood-censorship-do-barriers-constitute-censorship-20170119t145117271z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-01-19 14:51:18
last_update2017-01-19 14:51:18
depth1
children3
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-02-17 21:22:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length310
author_reputation27,542,287,033,381
root_title"Censorship... do barriers constitute Censorship?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@dwinblood · (edited)
This is correct.   Which does not stop you from going to make your own website.   I am speaking specifically about Steemit.com which is the flagship front end that is being pushed as censorship free.    If you put hoops and barriers (*no matter how subjectively easy you believe those are*) on someone to bypass those barriers then many will view it as censorship.   Will it be in reality? No, if they are not "lazy" (*again subjective*) they can go find it on the blockchain.    Yet perception is all that matters when it comes to PR and Marketing. 

Another thing about "lazy".   I might consider you LAZY because you don't leave people alone and just go write your own version of the website so you don't have to look at what you don't want to see.

I actually don't feel that way...   I only provide it as an example.    How challenging a "hoop" is to jump through is Subjective.    What a person must do in order to not be considered "lazy" is subjective.

Forcing your personal preferences upon OTHERS is wrong, if you are intending to make a free, uncensored, OPEN, community.
properties (22)
post_id1,790,897
authordwinblood
permlinkre-sneak-re-dwinblood-censorship-do-barriers-constitute-censorship-20170119t160827005z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-01-19 16:08:21
last_update2017-01-19 16:09:36
depth2
children2
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-02-17 21:22:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,083
author_reputation223,300,085,257,919
root_title"Censorship... do barriers constitute Censorship?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@sneak ·
> Steemit.com which is the flagship front end that is being pushed as censorship free

Anything posted via steemit.com will be published into the Steem Blockchain, which is free of censorship. Those posts and comments will live forever on many websites.

The display of posts on steemit.com has *never* been censorship free, and never will be.  It exists in a legal jurisdiction that mandates censorship xor jail for several different types of content.  We mitigate this by writing all *posts* to the Steem Blockchain.

What we display (or do not display) on steemit.com isn't even remotely approaching censorship of any kind.
properties (22)
post_id1,792,099
authorsneak
permlinkre-dwinblood-re-sneak-re-dwinblood-censorship-do-barriers-constitute-censorship-20170119t192138471z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-01-19 19:21:39
last_update2017-01-19 19:21:39
depth3
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-02-17 21:22:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length626
author_reputation27,542,287,033,381
root_title"Censorship... do barriers constitute Censorship?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000