유료구독모델은 여기서 다룰 문제는 아닌 듯합니다.

당장,,, 다운보팅 없애는 것만 얻어내도 큰 성과일 것 같습니다.

참고로 themarkymark 증인 반대합니다~!
다운보팅과 글로벌블랙리스트 사익을 위해 운영
온갖 더러운 짓 다 하는~!


블루엔젤 포스팅 참조하시면 반대 사유 있습니다~!

Posted using [Partiko Android](https://partiko.app/referral/bluengel)

투표한번한다고 변경 못하는거 아니지 않나요? 선조치 후생각...

Posted using [Partiko iOS](https://partiko.app/referral/epscu)

파워다운기간 단축을 위해서 져스틴계정으로 투표를!! 거기에 스마트컨트랙까지~

저스틴하고 직접 컨택을 해서 제안하는게 더 나아 보입니다.
밥팅들 대답 기다리느니...

30투표->1투표 변화 는 없네요 ㅎㅎ 이것도 얼른 되어야 담합을 막을수있을것같습니다

이것 좀 확인 부탁 드려요.아무것도 들어오질 않아서요.물어 볼 곳이 없어서 여기에 작성했어요.

TRANSACTION
2020. 3. 2. 오후 5:47:00

Transaction ID:
065c9120f6f842345a4e55f9c523cb14c961d609

Sidechain Block: 5674175

From: @twinpapa
To: @sctm.burn

Amount: - 23 SCTM

증인들이 이거 대답해줄지 의문이군요... 지금 골든타임이 지나가는듯.

Hey @sct, @proxy.token team. 
It seems you already moved in a direction with the new tron imposed witnesses without giving time to chat to the old community selected witnesses. 

To clarify to you the situation a bit further, we are at a stance that could make or break the steem blockchain. There are clearly malicious actions taking place from tron side to overtake the steem blockchain which started in coordination with exchanges as well, with the real intent is to simply move steemit as a dapp to tron and without any real plans for steem as a blockchain. This jeopardizes the existance of the blockchain itself. 
This is why our community and witnesses and pushing to ensure the blockchain is controlled by the community, not a single entity imposing tron's intentions, which is at the core of how decentralized systems are intended to function. 
In terms of your questions, and while we cannot respond on behalf of the community or the witnesses, yet we can at least confirn our vision altogether to grow and improve the blockchain in itself, including SMTs(smart contracts) and creating further growth roadmaps. 
The time now is to work on ensuring the survival of steem blockchain and creating a better community-induced growth to it. 
In the worst case, and should you still believe that the whole community stands differently than the way you perceive things, and as we believe you would intend for the whole ecosystem to grow, and if you sense you are undecided as to how to proceed, i would suggest removing your current votes so as not to tilt the balance to any side.

You should leave the status quo with 4 community witnesses. 

Also this looks like blackmail. Quite unethical.

거래소는 투표를 위해 고객 자금을 훔쳤습니다.  그들은 당신을 더 빨리 속이고 싶어합니다.  도둑을 숨길 수 있습니다.

Posted using [Partiko Android](https://partiko.app/referral/will-richards)

![](https://i.imgur.com/1IisxxB.png)

What do you mean by paid subscription? 

Pay a subscription to get a Steem account?

Also, did you consider that removing downvotes from Steem will allow bidbots to come back?

> Are you willing to shorten the SP power-down period to three to seven days from current period?

At most 7 days. Less than 7 days means you can Power Down Power Up and vote within the time of payout of a post, that has many security issues coming with it.

> Are you willing to remove down-voting policy of STEEM blockchain?

I agree with @arcange, I d agree to remove both upvotes and downvotes at Steem level and move it SMTs built on top of communities.

> Are you willing to introduce smart contact into the STEEM block chain?

Steem already works via smart contracts, do you mean the possibility to add custom ones to the blockchain? Sure.

> Are you willing to introduce a paid subscription model?

You mean at the blockchain level? That can already be done at application level with encryption and a paywall. But yea, why not.

> SP 파워다운 기간을 3일~7일로 단축할 의향이 있는가?
(Are you willing to shorten the SP power-down period to three to seven days from current period? )

Yes. Shortest should be 7 days in my opinion. 

> 스팀 블록체인의 다운보팅을 제거할 의향이 있는가?
(Are you willing to remove down-voting policy of STEEM blockchain? )

Downvotes should be able to be removed from communities with SMTs. Not from the main chain. There's a compromise to be had there. 

> 스팀 블록체인에 스마트 컨트랙트를 도입할 의향이 있는가?
(Are you willing to introduce smart contact into the STEEM block chain? )

Yes. Would you support a dev proposal for such work?

> 유료 구독 모델을 도입할 의향이 있는가?
(Are you willing to introduce a paid subscription model?)

Potentially. I don't know what you mean by this but increasing revenue for users is a good thing to me.

Hi thanks for your post, I hereby confirm my stance as follows:

1) (Are you willing to shorten the SP power-down period to three to seven days from current period? )

I am willing to shorten to 4 weeks as per the steemproposal I made, this gives a healthy balance to security and funds availability as well as prevents mass dumping on the market. You supported this proposal if you recall, but you never voted my witness when you decided to vote for a couple, I was very surprised and disheartened that you didn't because I was fighting for the very same lower powerdown times that you wanted and voted for.

2) Not right now, this is a massive change and there are no steemit devs left to code it, I do believe the free downvote pool is unfair and leads to downvote abuse, it also makes it a double deduction for example if you upvote something else you move rewards away from everything else, but by downvoting a particular post and upvoting something else at the same time, that post is extra penalised. Downvoting is needed to stop abuse otherwise the reward pool could be drained my malicious parties, but I don't believe in the free downvote pool. My business is heavily affected by it and I actually commented on your last post that I understand how it feels to be downvoted because I recently suffered the same, you didn't respond to me.

3) Smart contracts, yes! I agree that if we had smartcontracts we could do some fancy pegging of SBD to become more of an algo token like DAI, also SMT's without smart contracts are less appealing than other tokens on EOS, ETH or TRON that have that option if needed. If SMT's are going to compete with other chains then smart contracts should be added.

In the end none of this can be achieved with the current state of Steem, ex Steemit devs refuse to work for Justin and the only way is to get them back and get paid directly by the DAO they won't come back and build as long as the centralised witnesses are in place, and the longer we leave it the quicker we will lose them to other outside job opportunities.

I hope we can come together as a community with this. As you hopefully know, we are coming together daily currently on the MSP Discord server and discuss in long town hall meetings how to deal with this situation.

If you vote for the Justin Sun/Tron witnesses, you basically vote for centralization. If the Korean community wasn't heard enough before, than you are welcome to join the discussion and actually be part of what is happening. 

You are not only supporting the dictatorship with your reluctant opportunistic behavior, but you are trying to convey an open blackmail to an entire community - I thought that JustinE CunT is a rock bottom, now I see I was wrong - if karma gets her grabby hands on your mortal flash you will be the rain worm for the rest of eternity. Good luck with this shit, you will really need it. 

> Are you willing to shorten the SP power-down period to three to seven days from current period? 

Yes, but 7 days is too short 6 - 4 weeks sounds more reasonable.

> Are you willing to remove down-voting policy of STEEM blockchain?

To be negotiated and planned. Other witnesses suggestions are interesting but there might be other aspects to be thought of.

> Are you willing to introduce smart contact into the STEEM blockchain?

Yes, I'm supporting this idea as I believe it will add value to the chain by giving more opportunities to developers.

> Are you willing to introduce a paid subscription model?

Yes, if you are thinking allowing the chain to become a kind of decentralised Patreon. Content could be stored on the chain but access is restricted. Developing this on-chain instead of in dApp is an initial investment that can save time and money from projects owners who can then focus their effort on their product rather than the technical aspect of implementing the subscription model.

lets just break price feed for few weeks XD.

(The Steemit acquired by Tron reveals its future plans in an open letter.)

Wondering who will code stuff for Justin and how long it will take :)

It's great to see that we started a conversation with Korean community. I know you have thousands of people behind proxy.token and we have to respect their opinion as well. Each culture has its own differences and sometimes it's hard to find a good compromise that will suit everyone.

We do need to work together to make sure that the chain is not centralized, censorship-resistant and always up-to-date with new features that all of the users want and need.

With regards to the questions, on behalf of my witness at least I should say the following:
1. The power-down period can and should be shortened. But due to technical and security concerns, it should be at least 7 days. That is something everyone agreed upon.
2. I was never a fan downvotes, I've never used them and have no plans to do so. I think it is something that prevents freedom of speech.
3. Smart Contracts can be implemented by I'm not sure if there's a need for that. Steem works perfectly as it is right now, and that's one of the reasons we have so many apps built on Steem. In general, there's [a proposals system](https://steemproposals.com) that people can use to build smart contracts on top of Steem blockchain itself, so I think it's possible.
4. Subscription or revenue model is a must for every business to stay alive, as long as it doesn't prevent the free usage if Steem blockchain itself. We can have business models on top of what we already have. Otherwise, this has to be decided by the majority of witnesses like always.